SalafiTalk.Net
SalafiTalk.Net » Affairs of Manhaj
» Abuz Zubair al-Qutubi
Search ===>




Part 1Part 2Part 3Part 4Part 5Part 6Part 7Part 8Part 9 • Part 10 • Part 11 • Part 12


   Reply to this Discussion Start new discussion << previous || next >> 
Posted By Topic: Abuz Zubair al-Qutubi

book mark this topic Printer-friendly Version  send this discussion to a friend  new posts last

abu.anas.al-hindi
21-06-2007 @ 12:29 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Abu Anas Hasan Ahmed (London)
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: Oct 2002
          
Assalamu alaikum

Does anyone have any quotes to show if he is astray in manhaj/aqeeda?  He is behind a so called 'Islamic forum'.

ekbal.hussain
25-06-2007 @ 10:18 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Abu Abdullah Ekbal Hussain bin Siraj (London, UK)
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: Dec 2002
          
Wa 'Alaikumus Salam wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuhu

I found one article on Spubs, written years ago briefly mentioning 'Abu Zubair' in the footnnotes:

Excerpt from Article, 'The Creed of Imaam al-Albani on the Issues of Takfir and Apostasy' (Page 5):

quote:

...In our exposition of that ignorant and unjust Qutubi of the West, who in his description of the Salafis and their Mashayikh and Imams - amongst them Imam al-Albani and Imam Ibn Baaz - stated, "Murji'ah, not Salafis" and who described them in their totality as a "a contemporary movement of Ijraa disguised as Salafiyyah", and whose teenage followers accused Imam al-Albani of the Ijraa of Jahm Ibn Safwaan...1


Footnote (to the above text):

quote:

1 Such as the young child, Abu Zubair al-Azzami who sitting behind his glass screen (His PC) - day and night


LOL! Classic:

quote:

...Abu Zubair al-Azzami who sitting behind his glass screen - day and night...


Clearly evident when You visit His 'forum', He appears to be on there 24/7!  

May Allah guide Him.  Ameen.


You can read the full article by clicking here:

THE CREED OF IMAM-ALBANEE ON TAKFIR AND APOSTACY

To read more about 'Sayyid Qutb', the ideological figurehead of this sect and also one of the greatest innovators in Islamic History:

[url=http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/sp.cfm?secID=NDV&subsecID=NDV01&loadpage=displaysubsection.cfm]Sayyid Qutb[/url]

And of course His demented Blind followers - the 'Qutubis' and their Brothers the 'Surooris', only Allah knows best how much damage they have done to Islam and the Muslims and (the Salafi da'wah in particular):

[url=http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/sp.cfm?secID=GRV&subsecID=GRV07&loadpage=displaysubsection.cfm]Qutubis and Surooris [/url]


A MUST READ!

[url=http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/downloads/pdf/GRV070003.pdf]Readings in Elementary Qutubism[/url]

Excerpts from the article 'Readings in Elementary Qutubism':

Shaikh Salih al-Fawzaan states in the introduction to the excellent book: 'The Methodoloy of the Prophets in calling to Allah' by Shaikh Rabee' ibn Hadee al-Madkhalee:

quote:

These Groups have neglected the importance of Aqeedah (correct beliefs and creed) - except for a very few of them - and instead call for the correction of side issues.  So one group calls for the correction of rule and politics and demands establishment of the hudood (prescribed punishments), and that Sharee'ah (Islaamic Law) be applied in judging amongst the people - and this indeed is something very important, but it is not what is most important: Since how can one seek to establish and apply Allaah's judgement upon those who worship idols and graves, and those who deny or hold heretical beliefs with regards to Allaah's Names and Attributes - divesting them of their true meaning, or distorting them.  Are these people not greater criminals than those who fornicate, drink wine and steal?!!  Since those are crimes against mankind, whereas shirk and denial of Allaah's Names and Attributes are crimes against the Creator - the One free from all imperfections - and the right of the Creator has precedence over the rights of creation.


quote:

For indeed Allaah - the One free from all imperfections - informed that correct rule and sovereignty, which is the central part of the call of the former jamaa'ah whom we mentioned, cannot be achieved except after correcting aqeedah, such that all worship is for Allaah alone and worship of everything else is abandoned.

Allaah - the most High says:

"Allaah has promised to those amongst you who truly have Imaan (true faith and belief) and act in obedience to Allaah and His Messenger, that He will grant them rulership upon the earth, just as He granted it to those before them, and that He will establish their Religion for them and grant them the authority to practice their Religion which He chose and ordered them with.  And He will certainly change their situation to one of security, after their fear.  Providing that they worship and obey Me, not associating anything else in worship with Me.  Then, whoever rejects this favour by disobedience to their Lord - then they are the rebellious transgressors."  (Soorah an-Noor 24:55)


quote:

So these people wish to establish the Islaamic State before purifying the lands of idolatrous beliefs which take the form of worship of the dead, and devotion to the tombs - such as is no different to the worship of al - Laat, al-Uzzaa and the third of them Manaat, rather it is worse.  So they are attempting that which is IMPOSSIBLE.



Also worth reading:

[url=http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/downloads/pdf/MNJ130001.pdf]Frequently Asked Questions on Manhaj[/url]

This message was edited by ekbal.hussain on 6-27-07 @ 11:43 PM

ekbal.hussain
25-06-2007 @ 1:07 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Abu Abdullah Ekbal Hussain bin Siraj (London, UK)
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: Dec 2002
          
More from the same article (The Creed of Imaam al-Albani on the Issues of Takfir and Apostasy' [Page 18]):

Imaam Al-Albanee stated:

quote:

But if we want to pass a judgement that he has become an unbeliever, and apostatised, then we must accompany it with his approval of what he has done.  If he approves of it, then it is apostasy and he is to be executed, as is well-known in Islaam, from his (sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam), saying, "Whoever apostasizes from his religion, then kill him.

But if he follows his words with asking for forgiveness, and with repentance to Allaah, the Mighty and Majestic, then this is a proof that it was an eruption of rage, and we cannot apply to it the same consequences that we would apply to speech emanating delibrately and intentionally.18


Footnote:

quote:

18 SCOLDING ABU ZUBAIR AL-AZZAAMI, THE IGNORANT TEENAGER WHO ACCUSED IMAAM AL-ALBANI OF THE IRJAA' OF JAHM IBN SAFWAAN

Stated this ignoramus (on Saturday, September 16, 2000 - 06:45 pm), attempting to use the following example in order to ascribe Irjaa' to Imaam al-Albani:

"Similarly when the Sheikh was asked: "Some of the narrations have come from some of the Imaams, and from some of the companions, such as, Khaalid ibn al-Waleed, and some of the Imaams, such as, Imaam Ahmad about the kufr of the one who insults Allah or the Messenger, and they considered it to be Kufr or Riddah (apostasy).  So is this in absolute terms?  We hope for benefit".

To which the Sheikh replied: "We do not see this in absolute terms, for the insult or curse may result due to Jahl (ignorance) or bad upbringing, or it may occur due to one being unmindful.  And lastly, it may occur due to intent and knowledge, and if it occurs in this way, due to intent and knowledge, then it is Riddah (apostasy) in which there is no ambiguity.  But if it happens in a case from other cases to which I pointed, then taking care in abstaining from Takfeer is more important Islaamically than rushing towards Takfeer" (Cassette: al-kufr Kufraan: Tasjeelaat Bait al-Maqdis)."

So if this ignorant teenager ('Abu Zubair') claimed that this is Irjaa' from Imaam al-Albani and if only he had waited another 10 years so that he matured and moved further away from the age of puberty and adolescence, he would have realised that the point of discussion of the Shaikh is related to the conditions required for takfir (not as to whether an act is major kufr or not).  So the Shaikh mentions that if a person had knowledge of his act - that it necessitates kufr - and if he did it deliberately,  intending the act (as opposed to being compelled, etc.), then he is guilty of major kufr and has fallen into apostasy.  And this matter is explained fully in this discourse anyway, and it is also found in the words of Shaikh Muhammad Ibn Ibraaheem and also in the verdict of the Committe of Scholars.

But as for the Juwaihil who has taken it upon himself to discuss these issues and to narrate them to the people day and night, morning and evening, then he couldn't even understand what is as clear as daylight from the very statement he is using to ascribe innovation and misguidance to the Imaam of Ahl us-Sunnah of our times - and from Allaah is the refuge from his ignorance, misguidance and scum.  Know also that this Abu Zubair al-Azzaami was also the one who accused Imaam al-Albani of having the Irjaa' of Jahm Ibn Safwaan approximately 18 months ago - following his Qutubi teachers of the US in that - and may the curse of Allaah be upon those who lie.


Read the full article here:

THE CREED OF IMAAM AL-ALBANI ON THE ISSUES OF TAKFEER AND RIDDAH

This message was edited by ekbal.hussain on 6-27-07 @ 3:58 PM






SalafiPublications.Com
TawhidFirst | Aqidah | AboveTheThrone | Asharis
Madkhalis | Takfiris | Maturidis | Dajjaal
Islam Against Extremism | Manhaj
Ibn Taymiyyah | Bidah
How to Form the Plural Form in Arabic videos.


main page | contact us
Copyright © 2001 - SalafiTalk.Net
Madinah Dates Gold Silver Investments