SalafiTalk.Net
SalafiTalk.Net » Affairs of Manhaj
» Zakir Naik says EVERY Muslim should be a Terrorist ?!!!!????!!!!
Search ===>




Part 1Part 2Part 3Part 4Part 5Part 6Part 7Part 8Part 9 • Part 10 • Part 11 • Part 12


   Reply to this Discussion Start new discussion << previous || next >> 
Posted By Topic: Zakir Naik says EVERY Muslim should be a Terrorist ?!!!!????!!!!

book mark this topic Printer-friendly Version  send this discussion to a friend  new posts last

ekbal.hussain
20-03-2007 @ 7:19 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Abu Abdullah Ekbal Hussain bin Siraj (London, UK)
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: Dec 2002
          
Zakir Naik says:
quote:

So here the muslims are saying that Usaamah bin Laaden is either wrong.  I reject them!

quote:

But if you ask my view...  If He (Usaamah bin Laaden) is on the truth..  if he's fighting the enemies of Islam.  I'm for him.

quote:

If he's terrorising the terrorists... if he's terrorising America the terrorist... the biggest terrorist I am with him.

quote:

Every Muslim should be terrorist!  The thing is that if he is terrorising the terrorist he is following islam.


Here's the link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bxk5AAA5FbI

He said this in front of hundreds if not thousands of Muslims and non-Muslims!!!

Laa hawla wala quwwata illa billaah!

SyedImran
21-03-2007 @ 5:53 PM    Notify Admin about this post
AbuUbaid Syed Imran bin Syed Shamsul Bari (New York City, USA)
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Oct 2006
          
Assalamu Alikum wa rahmatullahi wa barkatuhu

Subhanaallahi wa bihamdihi, this kind "speakers" are being promoted by Jamate Ahlulhadith of India? Audubillah. May Allah Tayala Guide us to what He Azza wa Jalla is pleased with and love away from what He Tayala hates and dislikes. Ameen.

Assalamu ALikum wa rahmatullahi wa barkatuhu

Abuubaid Imran

AbooZakee
23-03-2007 @ 6:51 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Aboo Zakee 'Umar Ibn Ismaa'eel (Toronto, Canada)
Member
Posts: 140
Joined: Sep 2002
          
In addition,

is it not the 'so-called' and 'self-proclaimed' moderates who allow the Zakir Naiks and Hizbut-Tahreers of the world in to their lecture line-ups and conference booths. It just goes to show the true moderate path of Ahlus-Sunnah, those who are the 'true moderates' who scholastically refuted Naik and called the people away from him, yet you will see only after statements like this of Naik's will the Ikhwaanees leave him alone. Just like it took the non-Muslim governments to officially ban scum like hizbut-tahreer, such an open takfeeree hateful group before you see the ihkwaanees act. Ahlus-Sunnah have been warning against them from day one, yet the 'self-proclaimed' moderates cooperate with everyone (except ahlus-sunnah) in the name of unity and moderation, a smoke screen no doubt to gather the numbers (of people) and the numbers of entrance fees ($$$).

The sad thing is, that the Muslims truly believe they are participating in a moderate, unity-based function when they are actually a pawn in the gathering of sometimes 100's of thousands of dollars/pounds. There is only one thing that they are truly united about, and that's fighting against the moderate path of the salafiyyeen who wish to unite the people upon a single path (the way of the sahaabah), one which might not be laced with riches and fame.

abdullah.gambi
31-03-2007 @ 9:17 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Abu Mu-aawiyah Abdullah bin AbuBakr Al (UK)
Member
Posts: 379
Joined: Nov 2003
          
In The Name of Allaah The Most Merciful The Bestower Of Mercy

               The Reality of Philosophical Logic And Its Astray Adherents

Sheikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said:

??Philosophical logic is like the flesh of a camel at the top of a mountain.  It is not easy to climb the mountain, nor is the flesh good enough to justify climbing, nor is the path leading to it easy to follow.??

Source: Naseehat Ahl Eemaan Fee Radd alaa Mantiq al Yunaan. (page:157)

He (rahimahullaah) also said: ''There are no philosophers upon right guidance''

He (rahimahullaah) also said:

??Islaam does not have philosophers??

Imaam Ahmad said about Bishr al Mareesee, ''He was a sermoniser and not a person of proofs''.  

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Walil-laahil Hamd, it is clear that the views of this astray one (Zaki) are founded and mixed with this philosophical logic.  Islaam does not have philosophers-- therefore Zaki speaks in the name of Philosophy and not Islaam.  He is yet another sermoniser amongst ahlul bidah and not from the people of proofs.  

He has become more established upon opposition to the Book of Allaah (Subhaanah), The Sunnah of Al Mustapha (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam), and The Understanding of the Salafus Saalih.  That is because he persists upon upholding this worthless science of philosophical logic.

However, there are those who claim to be upon the sunnah, but present this philosopher on their websites.  They do not guard their tongues with regards to safeguading the honour of the Salafis and spreading slander and lies.  However, Zaki (the clear open deviant) finds a place in their hearts and their websites.    

Allaah is The One Who makes clear the Seraatal Mustaqeem, and we ask Him (subhaanah) for safety from the trial of the deviated ones.

Abu Mu-aawiyah Abdullaah Bin AbuBakr Al Fulaani Al Gambi

This message was edited by abdullah.gambi on 6-10-07 @ 9:05 PM

abdullah.gambi
01-04-2007 @ 7:10 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Abu Mu-aawiyah Abdullah bin AbuBakr Al (UK)
Member
Posts: 379
Joined: Nov 2003
          
In The Name Of Allaah The Most Merciful The Bestower Of Mercy
        


According to some of the diseased illegal partisans, the salafis should not refute zaki because he is against hindus and not ahlus sunnah

Indeed, the views of Zaki (Al Munharif) are from that which belittles and distorts the pure religion of Allaah (subhaanah)

Sheikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said:

''And due to this reason, the religion is sometimes altered by way of Tabdeel, and by way of substitution for another thing, whereas this religion can never be substituted.  

However, there is within it someone who brings into it Tahreef, and Tabdeel, and Lies, and Concealment by which truth is confounded with falsehood.

And it is inevitable that Allaah will establish in it (in this religion) those who establish the proofs through the path of the Messengers.  They repel from it the Tahreef of those who go beyond bounds, and the impersonation of the Liars, and the false interpretations of the ignorant ones.  

So Allaah (subhaanah) makes clear the truth and destroys falsehood even though the polytheists hate that (i.e. that the truth is manifested and falsehood destroyed) (Majmoo Ul Fataawa: 11/334-335)
--------------------------------------------------------------


All praise is due to Allaah, the Mashaayikh of Yemen have already clarified the destructive path of this Munharif (deviated one- Zaki Naik), and the hizbiyyah of some of the heads at Jamiat ahle hadith in their various maraakiz.

We ask Allaah by His Greatest Name to preserve the Mashaayikh of Ahlus sunnah and reward them with abundant good in this life and the next.  Likewise, we ask Allaah to reward the salafi du-aat, in particular the maintainers of this website in which is presented the manhaj of ahlus sunnah and its Ulema.

And we ask Him (Subhaanah) by His Greatest Name to guide or destroy the maintainers of the websites filled with ghebah, munkaraat, tamyi, and defence of innovators.    

Whenever the Mashayikh expose their figure heads and allies amongst the innovators with clear proofs, they do not take naseehah, rather they proceed to slander and lies, and neither the ulema nor the tullaabul ilm and the du-aat have been spared.    

Abu Mu-aawiayh Abdullaah Bin AbuBakr Al Fulaani al Gambi



Tabdeel:  

1.     Changing the sharee-ah-ruling with the rules one brings from himself and holding that they are from Allaah.
2.     Making the unlawful to be lawful, and this is holding the belief that what Allaah has made unlawful is lawful.
3.     Making the lawful unlawful, and this is holding the belief that what Allaah has made lawful is unlawful.

Refer to a very beneficial article titled: ??Tabdeel and Genghis Khan?? at www.salafipublications.com, article no: MNJ050018

Tahreef:

Introducing change in a statement--leaving out the meaning understood by it and accepting such a meaning which the words may indicate in a doubtful sense.

This message was edited by abdullah.gambi on 6-10-07 @ 9:07 PM

sajid_chauhan_81
20-07-2010 @ 5:38 AM    Notify Admin about this post
unspecified ساجد (Mumbai (India))
Member
Posts: 2031
Joined: Jul 2005
          
The youtube video that is mentioned in the 1st post on this thread is made by a supporter of the Ahmadiyyah sect. And that video is just a clip of a lecture and is not within context. The heading of this thread "Zakir Naik says Every Muslim should be a terrorist" is thus not correct.

No doubt his comments regarding the Khariji Ibn Laden are not correct and even at that time it was not correct for him to support him because by then Ibn Laden had already made khurooj of the Saudi Rulers.

Please click here for a detailed refutation of Dr. Naik (may Allaah rectify his affairs).






SalafiPublications.Com
TawhidFirst | Aqidah | AboveTheThrone | Asharis
Madkhalis | Takfiris | Maturidis | Dajjaal
Islam Against Extremism | Manhaj
Ibn Taymiyyah | Bidah
Arabic Verb Conjugation System


main page | contact us
Copyright © 2001 - SalafiTalk.Net
Madinah Dates Gold Silver Investments