SalafiTalk.Net » The Fitnah of Extremism, Ghuloo and the Haddaadis
» Shaykh Rabee`: Contention with Faalih on the Issue of Taqleed
Search ===>

Part 1Part 2Part 3Part 4Part 5Part 6Part 7Part 8Part 9 • Part 10 • Part 11 • Part 12

   Reply to this Discussion Start new discussion << previous || next >> 
Posted By Topic: Shaykh Rabee`: Contention with Faalih on the Issue of Taqleed

book mark this topic Printer-friendly Version  send this discussion to a friend  new posts last

11-07-2004 @ 11:47 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Abu `Iyaad   (UK)
Posts: 182
Joined: Sep 2002

  مناقشة فالح في قضية التقليد  
Contention with Faalih on the Issue of Taqleed

أبو عياض أمجد بن محمد رفيق
-=amjad bin muhammad=-

25-01-2005 @ 1:59 PM    Notify Admin about this post
unspecified unspecified (unspecified)
Posts: 63
Joined: Sep 2002

To allow the english reader to familiarise themselves with some of the erroneous principles of Faalih Al-Harbi here is a short translation of an important portion of this article, which Insha Allaah will give the reader some insight into the issue. I ask Allaah that He allows us to see the truth as the truth and to follow it, and He allows us to see falsehood as falsehood so that we can stay far away from it.

ودخل هو وفرقته الكامنة في سراديب الظلام يتأولون ويميعون ويدافعون
بالكذب والتمويه والطعن بالتلويح والتصريح لكل من يقول كلمة الحق بل امتد طعن بعضهم إلى الاستهانة بأئمة الجرح والتعديل وبأصولهم .
ولابد الآن من بيان بعض ما ناقشته فيه في النصيحتين مما كنت قد غضضت الطرف عنه سابقاً تلطفاً به .
كان فالح قد اندفع في التجديع والتبديع فكان بعض الشباب يطالبونه بالحجج على هذا التبديع فلا يجد الحجج المطلوبة منه .
فلجأ إلى اختراع أصل وهو إخراج التبديع عن أصول أئمة الجرح والتعديل وبنى على ذلك التفريق بين الرواية والتبديع.
فيرى أنه يحق أن يسأل عن أسباب جرح الرواة، وأما من يرى أنهم مبتدعة فلا يحق السؤال عن أسباب جرحهم وتبديعهم ولو كانوا من خيار السلفيين فلا يسأل عن أسباب تبديعهم بل يبدع من يسأل عن أسباب تبديعهم.
فجره هذا التأصيل إلى القول بوجوب تقليد العلماء(3) وعدم سؤالهم عن الحجة .
ومن هم المطالبون بتقليد العلماء إنهم طلاب العلم الأذكياء بل الأساتذة ومنهم بعض الدكاترة لا العوام وأن من لا يقلد العلماء فقد نسف رسالات الرسل والكتب أو كذب الكتاب والسنة وكذب الإسلام .
وظن هو وأتباعه أنه الإمام الأوحد الحامي حمى الدين فذهب يؤزهم ويؤزونه فيضرب رؤوس أهل السنة القوي منهم والضعيف بالتبديع الباطل والأحكام الجائرة .
فالذي لا يقلده ولو كان حائزاً لدرجة الدكتوراه في الشريعة الإسلامية يعتبره مكذباً للكتاب وللسنة وللإسلام.
والذي لا يقلده في رأيه الباطل في الانتخابات ولو كان أستاذاً يحكم عليه بأنه من الدعاة على أبواب جهنم وأنه قد نسف رسالات الرسل والكتب التي نزلت عليهم

Shaykh Rabee said

He and his hidden group have entered the cellars of darkness, twisting, watering down and there defense is with lies and falsification, and they attack either explicitly or indirectly every individual that speaks the truth, to the extent that the abuse has extended to the belittlement of the Imams of Al-Jarh wat Ta'deel and their fundamental (principles). It is mandatory at this point that I elaborate on certain issues that I discussed with him in the two pieces of advice, which I previously overlooked  as to show him kindness. It occurred that Faalih had rushed to Tabdee' (declaring someone to be an innovator) and Tajdee', so some of the youth requested from him the proofs that support this tabdee', and they did not find the necessary evidences. Then he resorted to inventing a principle which was to remove tabdee' from the fundamentals of the Imams of Al-Jarh wat Ta-deel, and he built upon this the differentiation between tabdee' and Riwaayah. Therefore he believes that it is necessary to ask about the reasons why the Ruwaat (narrators of hadeeth) have been criticized, but when it comes to those who he holds to be innovators then it is not a requirement to ask about the reasons for this tabdee' and criticism, even if those (spoken against) were from the best of the Salafis, then still he should not be asked for the reasons why they have been declared innovators, instead he declares those who ask for the reasons for this tabdee' to be innovators. Him founding this as a fundamental (principle) lead to him saying that it is an obligation to blind follow the scholars and not ask them for the proof. Who were those who were being asked to blind follow the scholars? Verily they were intelligent students of knowledge and even some of the teachers amongst them were doctors (from the Islamic universities) and not the common people. He also described those who do not blind follow the scholars as destroying the message of the Messengers or having denied the Book, Sunnah and Islam. He and his followers think that he is the single Imam who protects the religion, so he supports them and they support him to attack the heads of the people of the Sunnah and Jamaa'ah, the strong and weak from them by declaring them innovators and pronouncing tyrannical rulings upon them.

وقال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية:
لا عيب على من أظهر مذهب السلف وانتسب إليه واعتزى إليه بل يجب قبول ذلك منه بالاتفاق فإن مذهب السلف لا يكون إلا حقا
مجموع الفتاوى 4/ 149

TawhidFirst | Aqidah | AboveTheThrone | Asharis
Madkhalis | Takfiris | Maturidis | Dajjaal
Islam Against Extremism | Manhaj
Ibn Taymiyyah | Bidah

main page | contact us
Copyright © 2001 - SalafiTalk.Net
Madinah Dates Gold Silver Investments