SalafiTalk.Net
SalafiTalk.Net » Affairs of Manhaj
» Shaikh Saalih Al-Fawzaan on Demonstrations
Search ===>




Part 1Part 2Part 3Part 4Part 5Part 6Part 7Part 8Part 9 • Part 10 • Part 11 • Part 12


   Reply to this Discussion Start new discussion << previous || next >> 
Posted By Topic: Shaikh Saalih Al-Fawzaan on Demonstrations

book mark this topic Printer-friendly Version  send this discussion to a friend  new posts last

Al-Majhool
08-26-2002 @ 12:00 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Aug 2002
          
Shaikh Saalih Al-Fawzaan on Demonstrations

By: Shaikh Saalih Al-Fawzaan

Question and Answer session on Paltalk

Question: Noble Shaikh, there have come many questions asking about the position a Muslim should take with regard to what is going on with our brothers in Palestine, with respect to supplicating (for them), giving them money or making Jihad with them.

Answer: What is obligatory for the Muslim is that he make du?aa (supplicate) for his Muslim brothers, and assist them with money. He should aid them with money and supplication. This is what is obligatory on them and this is what will benefit them (i.e. the Palestinians).

Question: May Allaah reward you O Shaikh, the next questioner is asking: What is the ruling on demonstrating. Is it considered Jihad in the Cause of Allaah?

Answer: There is no benefit in demonstrations ? it is just commotion. It is from the types of disorder. How will it cause harm to the enemy if the people go out and demonstrate in one of the streets, raising their voices? Rather, this is from the things that will only make the enemy pleased and happy. Thus he will say: ?This has harmed and hurt them.? So the enemy will rejoice.

Islaam is a religion of tranquility and calmness; it is a religion of knowledge. It is not a religion of clamor and commotion. It is a religion that strives to achieve tranquility and calmness, while at the same time, (encourages) doing deeds that are of benefit and praise, such as providing support for the Muslims, supplicating for them and providing them with money and weapons. This is praiseworthy. And also (what is beneficial is) arguing on their behalf to the various countries that the oppression they are in be uplifted and requesting from these countries, which claim to have democracy, that these Muslims be given their due rights. And the humanitarian rights is what these people boast so much about. However, according to them the only human is the disbeliever, whereas the Muslim in their eyes is not a human being ? he is a terrorist! They call the Muslims terrorists! And the human being that has (humanitarian) rights, to them, is the disbeliever!

So the Muslims must follow and adhere to the methodology Islaam has prescribed with regard to these occurrences and other situations. Islaam did not come with demonstrations and shouting and raising the voices out loud. It did not prescribe destroying property or committing violations. All of this is not part of Islaam. Yes? Nor does this bring about any benefit. This only causes harm to the Muslims and it does not harm the enemy. This only harms the Muslims and it does not harm their enemy. In fact, their enemy rejoices at this and says (to himself): ?I have affected them?, ?I have made them angry? and ?I have influenced them.?


We follow the Haq, the Haq doesn't follow us...................

zejd.peqin
04-16-2010 @ 8:40 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 795
Joined: Oct 2008
          
Rallies, Demonstrations, & Protests:Have they been Foretold in Islam?

Author:Shaykh Hamood at-Tuwayjiree
Translated exclusively for www.bakkah.net: Moosaa Richardson


Shaykh Hamood at-Tuwayjiree refutes the claim of Shaykh Aboo Bakr al-Jazaa'iree that rallies, demonstrations, and protests have been specifically foretold in Islam by the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu 'alayhe wa sallam)


Click the link:

http://www.bakkah.net/articles/rallies-demonstrations-protests.htm

zejd.peqin
12-08-2010 @ 10:58 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 795
Joined: Oct 2008
          
Revolutions, Coups and Revolts Were Not the Way of the Righteous Salaf in Repelling Oppression and Tyranny.


The vast majority of the groups present today in the field of da'wah try to win the sentiments and support of the people by focusing and pointing their fingers towards the rulers. They make them the scapegoats for all the calamities, evils and ills to befall the Ummah, and subsequently make their methodologies of reform based around coups, revolutions and bringing about the downfall and replacement of governments. All of this is based upon ignorance of the Sharee'ah and ignorance of Allaah's Divine wisdom, and is a mental outlook that is based upon a corrupt underlying aqidah.


Read the full article: http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/articles/ctcdt-revolutions-coups-and-revolts-were-not-the-way-of-the-righteous-salaf-in-repelling-oppression-and-tyranny.cfm

zejd.peqin
12-23-2010 @ 1:48 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 795
Joined: Oct 2008
          
Imaam an-Nawawi (rahimahullaah) said in Sharh Saheeh Muslim (12/229):

And as for revolt - meaning against the rulers - and fighting them, then it is haraam by unanimous agreement (ijmaa') of the Muslims, even if they are sinful oppressors. And the hadeeth are abundantly overwhelming with the meaning that I have mentioned. And Ahl us-Sunnah are united that the ruler is not to be removed, on account of his sinfulness. As for the angle that has been mentioned in some of the books of fiqh of some of our associates, that he is to be removed, and which is quoted from the Mu'tazilah, then this is an error on behalf of the one who says it and is in opposition to the Ijmaa'. And the Scholars have said, that the reason for the absence of his removal and the forbiddence of revolting against him, is due to what arises from that of tribulations, and shedding of blood, and also corruption that is evident. Hence, the harm from his removal is greater than from him remaining in place.


Read the full article in the link below:
http://www.islamagainstextremism.com/articles/wllwd-imaam-an-nawawee-revolting-is-the-opinion-of-the-mutazilah-and-some-of-the-jurists-and-it-is-an-error.cfm

zejd.peqin
01-04-2011 @ 2:15 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 795
Joined: Oct 2008
          
The Fatwa of Imaam Muhammad Ibn Saalih al-żUthaymeen Concerning Protests and Demonstrations



Imaam Muhammad Ibn Saalih al-Uthaymeen (d.1421H) rahimahullaah  was asked in Muharram of 1416H, what follows, What is the Sharee'ah ruling concerning what they have called żstaging sit-ins within the mosquesż and they - as they claim ż rely upon your fatwaa concerning the previous conditions of Algeria. They say that it is permissible, as long as there is no controversy or disturbance of the peace. So what is the ruling concerning this and what do you direct us to do?

So he answered, As for me, then how much I have been lied against! I ask Allaah to guide the ożne who lied upon me, until he repents from the likes of what he is upon. It is amazing to see a people doing with, whilst they do not realize what has already occurred in other countries whose youth utilized the likes of these methods! What did they achieve? Have they succeeded in anything? Yesterday the London news said that the number of those who were killed from amongst the Algerians throughout the last three years has reached forty thousand! Forty thousand!! This is a great number of Muslims to lose to the events of this chaos! And the first part of the Fire ż as you may know ż is a spark and then it is an inferno, because when the people hate each other and their rulers as well, and they begin to carry weapons, what will prevent them? So the affair will reach evil and chaos. Indeed, the Prophet (żalayhis-salaatu was-salaam) commanded the ożne who saw an evil from his leader which he hated, to be patient. He said, żWhomsoever dies without a leader dies upon a death of jaahiliyyah (pre-Islaamic times of ignorance).ż The obligation upon us is to advise as much as we are able. As for competing in protests and staging public demonstrations, then this is in opposition to the guidance of the Salaf. Indeed, now you know that these affairs have no connection to the Shareeżah, nor any connection to rectification. It is nothing except harmż

This was four years ago. As for today, then the statistics reports have indicated that the current number is three times as much! And Allaah knows best about those whose affair is unknown, nor is there any sign of them to be found. He is referring to the statement of the Prophet (sallallaahu żalayhi wa sallam), żWhomsoever sees something from his leader that he dislikes, then let him be patient upon it. So whomsoever separates from the Jamaażah a hand-span, then he does not die, except a death of Jaahiliyyah (pre-Islaamic times of ignorance).ż Related by al-Bukhaaree (no. 7054) and Muslim (no. 1849) from the hadeeth of Ibn żAbbaas (radiyallaahu żanhu).

Said Shaykhul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (d.728H) ż rahimahullaah ż commenting upon a hadeeth with this meaning, żSo this is a prohibition from revolt (khurooj) against the rulers, even if he disobeys Allaah.ż Refer to Minhaajus-Sunnah (3/394). 21 Saheeh: Related by Ahmad (4/96), Ibn Abee żAasim in as-Sunnah (no. 1057), Aboo Yażlaa (no. 7357), Ibn Hibbaan (no. 4573) and at-Tabaraanee (17/769) and it is Saheeh. Ahaadeeth have been mentioned with the same meaning by al-Bukhaaree (no. 7053) and Muslim (no. 1747-1751) and other than them.


The Fatwa of Imaam żAbdul-żAzeez Ibn żAbdullaah Ibn Baaz Concerning Protests and Demonstrations


Imaam żAbdul-żAzeez Ibn żAbdullaah Ibn Baaz ż rahimahullaah ż was asked in Shażbaan of 1412H in the city of Jeddah, żAre the demonstrations by men and women done against the rulers to be counted from amongst the means (wasaażil) of dażwah? And is the ożne who dies in these rallies and demonstrations to be referred to as a shaheed (martyr) in the path of Allaah?

So the Imaam ż rahimahullaah ż answered, I do not view the rallies and demonstrations done by women and men to be from the treatment. However, I do see that they are from amongst the causes of fitan and from amongst the causes of evil and from amongst the causes of transgression upon some people and to have enmity towards some people without due right. Rather, the Sharee'ah means consist of writing letter, advice and calling to goodness by Sharee'ah legislated means that the people of knowledge have explained. And the Companions of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu żalayhi wa sallam) and their followers in goodness have all explained these means to be writing letters and speaking along withż and with the leader and calling him and advising him and writing to him, without publicizing the affair upon the pulpits that he did such and such and such and such emanated from him. And Allaah is the ożne from whom aid is sought.


Source:WestLondonDawahYahooGroup

zejd.peqin
01-09-2011 @ 10:33 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 795
Joined: Oct 2008
          
Scholars on demonstrations!

فتاوى العلماء في المظاهرات !
أخي الكريم بين يديك فتاوى العلماء حول المظاهرات وفيه الرد على من ينادون بهذه المظاهرات تحت اسم الاصلاح نسأل الله أن يهدي الجميع لما فيه الخير .

سماحة الشيخ عبدالعزيز بن بازرحمه الله:

السؤال : هل المظاهرات الرجالية والنسائية ضد الحكام والولاة تعتبر وسيلة من وسائل الدعوة وهل من يموت فيها يعتبر شهيداً؟

الجواب :لا أرى المظاهرات النسائية والرجالية من العلاج ولكني أرى أنها من أسباب الفتن ومن أسباب الشرور ومن أسباب ظلم بعض الناس والتعدي على بعض الناس بغير حق ولكن الأسباب الشرعية ، المكاتبة ، والنصيحة، والدعوة إلى الخير بالطرق السليمة الطرق التي سلكها أهل العلم وسلكها أصحاب النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم وأتباعهم بإحسان بالمكاتبة والمشافهة مع الأمير ومع السلطان والاتصال به ومناصحته والمكاتبة له دون التشهير في المنابروغيرها بأنه فعل كذا وصار منه كذا، والله المستعان

وقال أيضاً ـ رحمه الله ـ: والأسلوب السيئ العنيف من أخطر الوسائل في رد الحق وعدم قبولـه أو إثارة القلاقل والظلم والعدوان والمضاربات ويلحق بهذا الباب مايفعله بعض الناس من المظاهرات التي تسبب شراً عظيماً على الدعاة، فالمسيرات في الشوارع والهتافات ليست هي الطريق الصحيح للإصلاح والدعوة فالطـــريق الصحيح ، بالزيارة والمكاتــــــــبات بالتي هي أحســن.

فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن عثيمين رحمه الله:

السؤال :ما مدى شرعية مايسمّونه بالاعتصام في المسـاجــد وهم -كما يزعمون- يعتمدون على فتوى لكم في أحوال الجزائر سابقاً أنَّها تجوز إن لم يكن فيها شغب ولا معارضة بسلاح أو شِبهِه، فما الحكم في نظركم؟ وما توجيهكم لنا؟

الجواب : أمَّا أنا، فما أكثر ما يُكْذَب علي! وأسأل الله أن يهدي من كذب عليَّ وألاّ يعود لمثلها. والعجبُ من قوم يفعلون هذا ولم يتفطَّنوا لما حصل في البلاد الأخرى التي سار شبابها على مثل هذا المنوال! ماذا حصل؟ هل أنتجوا شيئاً؟

بالأمس تقول إذاعة لندن: إن الذين قُتلوا من الجزائريين في خلال ثلاث سنوات بلغوا أربعين ألفاً! أربعون ألفاً!! عدد كبير خسرهم المسلمون من أجل إحداث مثل هذه الفوضى!.

والنار ـ كما تعلمون ـ أوّلها شرارة ثم تكون جحيماً؛ لأن الناس إذا كره بعضُهم بعضاً وكرهوا ولاة أمورهم حملوا السلاح ما الذي يمنعهم؟ فيحصل الشرّ والفوضى .، وقد أمر النبيّ -عليه الصلاة والسلام- من رأى من أميره شيئا يكرهه أن يصــبر ، وقال: ż من مات على غير إمام مات ميتة جاهليةżالواجب علينا أن ننصح بقدر المستطاع، أما أن نُظْهر المبارزة والاحتجاجات عَلَناً فهذا خلاف هَدي السلف، وقد علمتم الآن أن هذه الأمور لا تَمُتّ إلى الشريعة بصلة ولا إلى الإصلاح بصلة.

ما هي إلا مــضرّة ...، الخليفة المأمون قَتل مِن العلماء الذين لم يقولوا بقوله في خَلْق القرآن قتل جمعاً من العلماء وأجبر الناسَ على أن يقولوا بهذا القول الباطل، ما سمعنا عن الإمام أحمد وغيره من الأئمة أن أحداً منهم اعتصم في أي مسجد أبداً، ولا سمعنا أنهم كانوا ينشرون معايبه من أجل أن يَحمل الناسُ عليه الحقد والبغضاء والكراهية...

ولا نؤيِّد المظاهرات أو الاعتصامات أو ما أشبه ذلك، لا نؤيِّدها إطلاقاً، ويمكن الإصلاح بدونها، لكن لا بدّ أن هناك أصـــابع خفيّة داخلـــــــية أو خارجية تحاول بثّ مثل هذه الأمور.



فضيلة الشيخ صالح الفوزان حفظه الله:

السؤال : هل من وسائل الدعوة القيام بالمظاهرات لحل مشاكل الأمة الإسلامية؟

الجواب : ديننا ليس دين فوضى ديننا دين انضباط ودين نظام وهدوء وسكينة ، والمظاهرات ليست من أعمال المسلمين وماكان المسلمون يعرفونها ، ودين الإسلام دين هدوء ودين رحمة ودين انضباط لا فوضى ولا تشويش ولا إثارة فتن، هذا هو دين الإسلام والحقوق يتوصل إليها بالمطالبة الشرعية والطرق الشرعية والمظاهرات تحدث سفك دماء وتحدث تخريب أموال . فلا تجوز هذه الأمور.

فضيلة الشيخ صالح بن غصون رحمه الله:

السؤال : في السنتين الماضيتين نسمع بعض الدعاة يدندن حول مسألة وسائل الدعوة وإنكار المنكر ويدخلون فيها المظاهرات ، والاغتيالات ، والمسيرات وربما أدخلها بعضهم في باب الجهاد الإسلامي. أ-نرجوا بيان ما إذا كانت هذه الأمور من الوسائل الشرعية أم تدخل في نطاق البدع المذمومة والوسائل الممنوعة؟

ب- نرجوا توضيح المعاملة الشرعية لمن يدعو إلى هذه الأعمال، ومن يقول بها ويدعو إليها؟

الجواب : الحمد لله: معروف أن الأمر بالمعروف والنهي عن المنكر والدعوة والإرشاد من أصل دين الله عزجل ، ولكن الله جل وعلا قال في محكم كتابه العزيز:

( ادع إلى سبيل ربك بالحكمة والموعظة الحسنة وجادلهم بالتي هي أحسن) ولما أرسل عزوجل موسى وهارون إلى فرعون قال: ( فقولا له قولاً ليناً لعله يتذكر أو يخشى) والـــنبي صلى الله عليه وسلم جاء بالحكمة وأمر بأن يسلك الداعية الحكمة وأن يتحلى بالصبر ، هذا في القرآن العزيز في سورة العصر بســــم الله الرحمن الرحيم: (والعصر * إن الإنسان لفي خسر* إلا الذين ءامنوا وعملوا الصالحات وتواصوا بالحق وتواصوا بالصبر). فالداعي إلى الله عزوجل والآمر بالمعروف والناهي عن المنكر عليه أن يتحلى بالصبر وعليه أن يحتسب الأجر والثواب وعليه أيضاً أن يتحمل ماقد يسمع أو ماقد يناله في سبيل دعوته، وأما أن الإنسان يسلك مسلك العنف أو أن يسلك مسلك والعياذ بالله أذى الناس أو مسلك التشويش أو مسلك الخلافات والنزاعات وتفريق الكلمة، فهذه أمور شيطانية وهي أصل دعوة الخوارج ، هم الذين ينكرون

المنكر بالسلاح وينكرون الأمور التي لايرونها وتخالف معتقداتهم بالقتال وبسفك الدماء وبتكفير الناس وما إلى ذلك من أمور ففرق بين دعوة أصحاب النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم وسلفنا الصالح وبين دعوة الخوارج ومن نهج منهجهم وجرى مجراهم، دعوة الصحابة بالحكمة وبالموعظة وببيان الحق وبالصبر وبالتحلي واحتساب الأجر والثواب، ودعوة الخوارج بقتال الناس وسفك دمائهم وتكفيرهم وتفريق الكلمة وتمزيق صفوف المسلمين، هذه أعمال خبيثة، وأعمال محدثة.

والأولى للذين يدعون إلى هذه الأمور يُجانبونَ ويُبعد عنهم ويساء بهم الظن، هؤلاء فرقوا كلمة المسلمين، الجماعة رحمة والفرقة نقمة وعذاب والعياذبالله ، ولواجتمع أهل بلد واحد على الخير واجتمعوا على كلمة واحدة لكان لهم مكانة وكانت لهم هيبة.

لكن أهل البلد الآن أحزاب وشيع، تمزقوا واختلفوا ودخل عليهم الأعداء من أنفسهم ومن بعضهم على بعض، هذا مسلكٌ بدعي ومسلك خبيث ومسلك مثلما تقدم ، أنه جاء عن طريق الذين شقوا العصا والذين قاتلوا أمير المؤمنين علي بن أبي طالب -رضي الله عنه- ومن معه من الصحابة وأهل بيعة الرضوان، قاتلوه

zejd.peqin
01-18-2011 @ 2:40 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 795
Joined: Oct 2008
          
Demonstrations/protests and a refutation of Abdur Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq

Written by/Said by Al-Imaam Abdul Azeez Ibn Abdullaah Ibn Baaz(Rahimahullaah)
Taken from Fataawaa al-Aimmah fee an-Nawaazil al-Mudlahimmah (pg. 87-91)




He (Shaykh Ibn Baaz) was asked (Rahimahullaah) in the month of Sha'baan in the year 1412 Hijrah in the city of Jeddah on an audio cassette:

Are (political) demonstrations for men or women in protest of governments or leaders considered a means of da'wah? And if someone dies during them, are they considered to be a martyr for the sake of Allaah?

He (Shaykh Ibn Baaz) (Rahimahullaah) answered:

I do not believe that (political) demonstrations for men or women are a solution. Rather, I believe they are causes of Fitnah and causes of evils. They result in the hatred of people and going to extremes in hating some people without right. In contrast, the correct, legislated methods include: writing letters, giving advice, and calling to that which is good based upon ways that have been legislated. These ways have been explained by the people of knowledge and have been illustrated by the Companions of Allaah's Messenger (Sallallahu 'Alaihi Wa Sallam) and those who followed them in righteousness. These means include: exchanging letters, verbal conversations with the leaders or authorities, calling them, exchanging sincere advice or writing to them, all without defaming them while upon the Minbars (saying) they did this and they caused that. And Allaah is the One from Whom we seek help."

He (Rahimahullaah) also said in the course of his refutation on Shaykh Abdur Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq:

"Sixthly: You mentioned in your book (Fusool min as-Siyaasah ash-Shar'iyyah), pg. 31 and 32, that demonstrations are from the ways of the Prophet's da'wah (Sallallahu 'Alaihi Wa Sallam). And I don't know of any text indicating this meaning. So I would like a narrated proof from the one who mentioned that and from which book you have found that in.

If you don't have any basis for that, then it is obligatory that you take it back and recant from it. This is because I don't know anything from the texts that indicate this and from what is already known of the many corruptions resulting from such demonstrations. If there is an authentic text regarding them, then it must be clarified with a complete understanding of how the text has come so that those people who intend nothing but corruption do not associate this (text) with their false demonstrations.

And Allaah is the One responsible for granting us and you success with beneficial knowledge and righteous action. (And we ask Him) to rectify all of our hearts and actions and that He makes us among the rightly-guided ones who correctly guide others. Indeed, He is the Most Generous.

Wa as-Salaamu alaykum wa Rahmatullaahi wa Barakaatuhu. (1)

The following is a follow-up reply to the reply written by, or on behalf of Abdur Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq

From Abdul Azeez Ibn Abdullaah Ibn Baaz to the noble son, the companion of al-Fadheelah ash-Shaykh Abdur Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq:

As-Salaamu alaykum wa rahmatullaahi wa barakaatuhu, as for the following:

Your noble book has reached me and it has pleased me greatly for what it contained of agreement upon what I advised you about. So I ask Allaah to increase myself and you in success and that He makes us and you among the rightly-guided ones who correctly guide others. Indeed, He is the Most Generous.

What you have mentioned regarding demonstrations - I have understood it and have also known the weakness of the chain of narration as you have mentioned. The chain revolves around Ishaaq ibn Abi Farwah and he is not considered a proof. And even if the chain were authentic, then certainly this was in the beginning of Islaam before the Hijrah and before the completion and perfection of the Sharee'ah.

And it is no secret that the base-rule with commands and prohibitions, as well as the rest of the rulings of the religion, depends upon what the Sharee'ah has settled upon after the Hijrah. As for what relates to al-Jumu'ah and the Eeds and similar social gatherings which the Prophet (Sallallahu 'Alaihi Wa Sallam) called for such as the Eclipse Prayer or the Prayer for Rain; all of that is from the point of view of making apparent the rites of Islaam and there is no relationship between that and demonstrations as is obvious.

And I ask Allaah to grant myself and you as well as the rest of our brothers an increase in beneficial knowledge and working according to it, and that He rectifies our hearts and all of our deeds, and that He grants us and you and all the Muslims refuge from the misguidance of Fitnahs and the temptations of Shaytaan. Indeed, He (Allaah) is the best trustee.

1      Majmoo' Fataawaa Samaahah ash-Shaykh Abdul-Azeez Ibn Baaz, (8/245).

Source:WestLondonDawahYahooGroup

zejd.peqin
02-02-2011 @ 2:58 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 795
Joined: Oct 2008
          
Question: Is that which in present days is known as a "military coup" against the ruler, mentioned in the Religion or is it an innovation?

Answer Shaykh Albaany(Rahimuhullah): There is no basis for these actions in Islaam. And it is in opposition to the Islaamic methodology with regard to establishing the da'wah (Call to Islaam) and creating the right atmosphere for it. Rather, it is only an innovation introduced by the disbelievers, which has influenced some Muslims. This is what I stated in my notes and explanation to Al-'Aqeedah At-Tahaawiyyah.
[Al-Asaalah, Issue #10]

zejd.peqin
02-02-2011 @ 7:49 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 795
Joined: Oct 2008
          
Shaikh Saalih al-Fawzaan on demonstrations in the West

The following is from a Question and Answer session addressed to
Shaikh Saalih ibn Fawzaan al-Fawzaan, one of the leading scholars of
Saudi Arabia, and held over Paltalk on 14th April 2002.

Q: Honoured Shaikh, ahsanallahu ilaykum, is it permissible for us to
stage demonstrations in the lands of the West in order to support the
muslims? Sometimes Jews and Christians participate with us, since
this (i.e. demonstrations) is allowed by law? Maybe these
demonstrations will achieve a goal?

A: "The Muslims must differentiate themselves by observing the
etiquettes and manners of islaam. And demonstrations are not among
these manners. Rather demanding our rights is to be done through
lawful shar'ah means... demanding one's rights is through lawful
means. As for demonstrations, then they are not from the guidance of
Islaam. The Muslims, in the Muslims countries and outside of them,
should differentiate themselves with the manners of Islaam, and not
adopt the manners of the disbelievers. And that which they do [i.e.
demonstrations] is not from the manners of Islaam."

English translation by Abu Abdir-Rahmaan Al atharee

**A recording of this session can be accessed online.

zejd.peqin
02-04-2011 @ 2:26 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 795
Joined: Oct 2008
          
Ibn al-Qayyim: It is From the Divine Wisdom That Kings and Rulers Are Simply a Manifestation of the Actions of the Servants, Like for Like


http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/articles/tyjmk-it-is-from-the-divine-wisdom-that-kings-and-rulers-are-simply-a-manifestation-of-the-actions-of-the-servants.cfm

zejd.peqin
02-04-2011 @ 2:50 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 795
Joined: Oct 2008
          
Shaykh Salih al-Fawzan Demolishes the Doubts of the Qutbiyyah Kharijiyyah Regarding Obedience, Takfir and Revolt

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/iywsi-shaykh-salih-al-fawzan-demolishes-the-doubts-of-the-qutbiyyah-kharijiyyah-regarding-obedience-takfir-and-revolt.cfm

dksadiq
02-06-2011 @ 6:09 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 338
Joined: Jul 2007
          
جزاك الله خيرا اخي،

And here is some Advice from Shaykh Dr. Muhammad ibn Haadee al-Madkhaalee (may Allah reward him and preserve him) to the People of Egypt regarding the Demonstrations & Events - may Allah grant correct the situation of things there:
quote:
(نصيحة لأهل مصر حول المظاهرات والأحداث) لفضيلة الشيخ د. محمد بن هادي المدخلي -حفظه الله-


zejd.peqin
03-08-2011 @ 8:42 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 795
Joined: Oct 2008
          
Imaam al-Albaani from the cassette, "Kaifiyah al-Ta'aamul ma'al-Waaqi'"

    ...Hence, the matter is not connected only to the rulers, rather it has a connection to the subjects before it does with the rulers. The subjects - in the reality of their affair - the likes of those rulers befit them, just as they say, "the worm is from and in the pickle" [a phrase meaning the enemy is from within your own household]. Those rulers never descended from Mars, but they sprang "from us and within us." Hence, if we desire rectification of our circumstances, then that will not occur by declaring an open, vehement war against our rulers and forgetting ourselves. And yet we are from the completeness of the problem of the current situation today in the Islamic world! For this reason, we urge the Muslims that they return to their religion, and that they apply what they know of their religion, "And on that day the believers will rejoice, with the aid of Allaah", Hence, O our brothers, the affair is not as you perceive it, an expression of sentiments, and the raging (fury) of the youth, and revolutions like the foam of soap, it stirs and roars in its land, then you do not see any effect whatsoever from it."



And how apt is the answer of Shaykh Rabee' to the following question:

    Is coming out for demonstrations, performing revolutions and nurturing the youth upon them from the manhaj of Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'aah or not? Whether that is within the Muslim lands or outside of them, and what is your advice for whoever made them into a way of da'wah?

And this is the answer of the Shaykh:

    This is from the methodology of Marx and Lenin and their likes and it is not from the methodologies of Islaam. Revolutionism, spilling of blood, tribulations and difficulties are from the way of Marx, Lenin and al-Ikhwan al-Muslimoon simply augmented the madhhab of the Khawaarij with that (madhhab), and they say, as is their habit, "Islamic music" and "Islamic socialism" and "Islamic democracy" and "Islamic dancing." All of these misguidances they bring them from the East and the West, and from ancient and modern times, then they cloth them in the garb of Islam. May Allaah free Islaam from these ways, "Call to the way of your Lord with wisdom, good admonition and argue with them in ways that are best?" (16:125). And jihad has its own subject areas and has its conditions which are not these Marxist paths upon which they throw the garment of Islaam. They took revolution and socialism from Marx and Lenin, and they took democracy from America, and they say, "We fight against America", but they promulgate the American ideology, by Allaah they promulgate (it), for multiplicity in parties (al-ta'addudiyyah al-hizbiyyah), and sharing leadership, elections, demonstrations, they are all from the American ideology, and America spends millions of dollars to spread them across the world and they conquer nations by way of them. So they are the greatest of servants to America, and they spread this ideology, and then they say about other people, "They are agents of America!"
    
    Taken from www.manhaj.com






SalafiPublications.Com
TawhidFirst | Aqidah | AboveTheThrone | Asharis
Madkhalis | Takfiris | Maturidis | Dajjaal
Islam Against Extremism | Manhaj
Ibn Taymiyyah | Bidah
Sentence Structure in Arabic Grammar


main page | contact us
Copyright © 2001 - SalafiTalk.Net
Madinah Dates Gold Silver Investments