SalafiTalk.Net
SalafiTalk.Net » General Discussion
» The Tableeghee Encyclopedia: A Guide to the Heretical Sect of Shirk and Dalaal ? Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh
Search ===>




Part 1Part 2Part 3Part 4Part 5Part 6Part 7Part 8Part 9 • Part 10 • Part 11 • Part 12


 Moderated by Admin  Reply to this Discussion Start new discussion << previous || next >> 
Posted By Topic: The Tableeghee Encyclopedia: A Guide to the Heretical Sect of Shirk and Dalaal ? Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh -- page: 1 2 3

book mark this topic Printer-friendly Version  send this discussion to a friend  new posts last

abu.abdul.azeez
10-28-2003 @ 8:48 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? Muftee ul-Janoob Ahmad Bin Yahyaa an-Najmee Refutes Abu Bakr al-Jazaa?iree and His Shameless Defense of Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh

Abu Bakr al-Jazaa?iree stated in a letter to ?Alee Mubaarak: A news-carrier informed me that you don?t like Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh, and that you censure them and forbid khurooj with them. To this, I write the following statement:

Indeed, Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh - by Allaah - you will not find a jamaa?ah in the Islaamic world better than them in terms of spreading the Islaamic da?wah and rectification of individuals. Thus, I call you to retract from your opinions which have regretfully come from some students of knowledge, and that you encourage the brothers to perform khurooj with this jamaa?ah, for there is not to be found the likes of it this day in the Islaamic world. I say: This is upon knowledge and insight, Allaah knows this, and salaam.

So Shaykh an-Najmee responded: Verily, one of the Salafee brothers showed me a fatwa originating from ash-Shaykh Abu Bakr al-Jazaa?iree, in which he says: ?Indeed, Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh - by Allaah - you will not find a jamaa?ah in the Islaamic world better than them in terms of spreading the Islaamic da?wah and rectification of individuals.? Like this, Abu Bakr swears with this filthy oath - that you will not find a jamaa?ah in the Islaamic world better than Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh.

And I say: With regret, O Abaa Bakr, I did not think that it would come from you a betrayal to this extent! That you prefer Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh, the Soofiyyah, the Qubooriyyah (grave-worshippers), the Khuraafiyyah (having heretical beliefs and superstitions), the Deeoobandiyyah, al-Muskrikah (having aspects of shirk), over the ?aqeedah of tawheed, the Salafee ?aqeedah! Do you not know that the grave of the founder of this jamaa?ah is inside of [their primary] masjid? Do you not know that he used to sit at the Soofee graves, asking from them blessings and favors? Do you not know that Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh is built upon four Soofee orders? Do you not know that they show enmity towards the People of Tawheed, or have you not heard your Lord say to His Prophet:

 Az-Zumar (39):65

And indeed it has been revealed to you (O Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam)), as it was to those (Allh's Messengers) before you: "If you join others in worship with Allh, (then) surely (all) your deeds will be in vain, and you will certainly be among the losers."


Do you not hear your Lord the Most High saying to His Prophet:

 Ash-Shu'ara (26):213

So invoke not with Allh another ilh (god) lest you be among those who receive punishment.


Do you not fear Allaah O Jaabir (i.e. Abu Bakr al-Jazaa?iree) ? you allege this allegation and you swear by it, waging war upon the ?aqeedah in the Land of Tawheed, the Nation of Tawheed, and the place of hijrah of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam), the Messenger of Tawheed? And you allege that you have explained the Book of Allaah? Why didn?t you take a lesson from that which is contained in the Book of Allaah in terms of driving away shirk and calling to tawheed? So is there repentance, O Jaabir? And I fear that you will meet Allaah while persistent upon this fatwa, such that your position in front of Allaah will be a difficult position. So repent to Allaah before the door closes and the repentance is not accepted from you, for indeed, if you become arrogant and refuse, then I do not think except that you have been lost. And with Allaah is the success.

Source:
http://www.sahab.net/sahab/showthread.php?s=&threadid=294130

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 10-28-03 @ 9:09 AM

abu.anas.al-hindi
10-28-2003 @ 10:41 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: Oct 2002
          
Salamu alaikum,

Is not this Jazairee dead now?

Wassalam

abu.abdul.azeez
10-30-2003 @ 3:08 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? The Permanent Committee on the Innovations of Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh and the Impermissibility of Joining Them

Question: I have read many fataawaa from Your Excellency[1], and you have encouraged the student of knowledge to perform khurooj with Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh. And praise to Allaah, we went on khurooj with them and benefited greatly. However, O my Honorable Shaykh, I saw some actions [with them] which are neither found in the Book of Allaah nor in the Sunnah of His Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam), for example:
  1. Making a circle in the masjid in which every two or more persons review the final ten sawar from the Qur?aan, and the preserving of this action in this way every single time we go khurooj with them.
  2. Performing I?tikaaf on Thursday in a continuous way (i.e. singling out this specific day for I?tikaaf)
  3. Prescribing a fixed number of days for khurooj, and they are three days per year, forty days every month, and four months per lifetime.
  4. The collective, consistent du?aa after each bayaan.[2]
So how, O my Noble Shaykh, if I go out with this jamaa?ah should I deal with these action and doings which are not found in the Book of Allaah or the Sunnah of His Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam), knowing, O my Noble Shaykh, that it is difficult to change this manhaj, and that this is their [distinct] way? So we seek from you clarification.

Response: What you have mentioned from the actions of this jamaa?ah are all innovations, so joining them is impermissible until they hold fast to the manhaj of the Book and Sunnah and abandon the innovations.[3]

Head: 'Abdul-'Azeez Bin 'Abdullaah Bin Baaz
Member: Bakr Bin 'Abdullaah Abu Zayd
Member: 'Abdul-'Azeez Bin 'Abdullaah Bin Muhammad Aal ash-Shaykh
Member: Saalih Bin Fawzaan al-Fawzaan

Source: Fatwa no. 17776 dated 18/3/1416 by way of the following thread on sahab:
http://www.sahab.net/sahab/showthread.php?s=&threadid=251933

--------------------
[1] The questioner is presumably addressing the head of the committee, Shaykh ?Abdul-?Azeez Bin Baaz. Nevertheless, the fatwa is ascribed to all of the listed committee members.
[2] ?Bayaan? is what the Tableegh call their lectures. They are usually improvisational, i.e. the speaker speaks from his desires for almost an hour, inventing things as he goes along, and rarely mentions even a single aayah from Allaah?s book or authentic hadeeth of the Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam). Rather, they are designed to attract more people to go khurooj with them. Thus, you will hear many weak and fabricated ahaadeeth, ?miraculous? stories about their jamaa?ah, narrations of their satanic dreams, and other khuraafaat meant solely to dupe people into going with them. And the refuge is with Allaah ?Azz wa Jal.
[3] Thus, the mere presence of these innovations - and this without even mentioning their many aspects of shirk and grave-worship - is enough to warrant dissociation from this jamaa'ah.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 10-30-03 @ 2:31 PM

abu.abdul.azeez
10-31-2003 @ 12:33 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
Shaykh Saalih al-Luhaydaan: The Tableegh Are Not From the People of the Correct Manhaj (with Sound)

Here is the audio corresponding to the fatwa posted elsewhere in this thread.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 10-31-03 @ 12:40 AM


Attached Fileal-Luhaydaan.zip (31 Kbytes)

abu.abdul.azeez
11-02-2003 @ 11:06 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? Imaam ?Abdul-?Azeez Bin 'Abdullaah Bin Baaz (d. 1420): The Tableegh Are Amongst the 72 Sects Doomed For the Fire of Hell (with Sound)

Questioner: May Allaah be good to you: The hadeeth of the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) regarding the splitting of the Ummah, his statement: ?My Ummah will split into 73 sects, all of them are in Hell except for one?? So, is Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh, due to what they possess from shirkiyyaat (aspects of shirk) and bida? (innovations), and Jamaa?at ul-Ikhwaan ul-Muslimeen, due to what they possess from partisanship and revolting against those in authority and not hearing and obeying [them], do these two sects enter into the destroyed sects?

Shaykh Bin Baaz They enter into the 72. Whosoever opposes the ?aqeedah of Ahl us-Sunnah enters into the 72 sects. And what is meant by his (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) statement ?My Ummah...? is Ummat ul-Ijaabah (response), meaning they responded to him and openly showed their adherence to him. [So there are] 73 sects: the saved, secure sect which followed him and remained steadfast upon his religion, and the 72 sects, amongst whom are the disbelievers[1], and amongst them are the sinners, and amongst them are the innovators of various types.

Questioner: Meaning that these two sects are included in the 72?

Shaykh Bin Baaz Yes, they are included amongst the 72, as well as the Murji?ah[2] and other then them ? the Murji?ah and Khawaarij. Some of the People of Knowledge consider the Khawaarij to be amongst the disbelievers[3], outside [of Islam] but entering into the generality of the 72.

Source: Read the transcript and download the audio at the following link:
http://www.sahab.net/sahab/showthread.php?s=&threadid=298206

--------------------
[1] In other words, all amongst the 72 will enter Hell - those who died upon pure tawheed will eventually be taken out of the Fire, whereas those whose deviation reached the level of major kufr, such as the grave-worshippers, those who claim knowledge of the unseen, those who claim that Allaah reveals shar?ee knowledge to them, and others, will reside in the Fire eternally. And such deviation is found in abundance with the Tableegh, and the refuge is with Allaah. May Allaah keep us away from the Fire and all that leads to it.
[2] They are those who remove actions from eemaan, i.e. a servant's actions do not effect his eemaan. And the Murji?ah have three main levels: (1) Those who say that he who merely affirms the existence of the Creator has completed eemaan. And this is the saying of the khabeeth, the zindeeq, the mulhid, Jahm Bin Safwaan at-Tirmidhee (d. 128) and his followers, the Jahmiyyah. (2) Those who say that he who affirms the religion of Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) with his heart has completed eemaan. And this is the saying of the Ashaa?irah and Maatureediyyah. (3) Those who say that that he who affirms Islaam with his heart and tongue has completed eemaan, and this is the saying of the Ahnaaf (followers of the Hanafee madh-hab). In general the Tableegh are level 2 Murji?ah, although many have level 1 irjaa?, and the refuge is with Allaah.
[3] This opinion has been attributed to Imaam Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa?ah Ahmad Bin Hanbal ash-Shaybaanee and others from the Hanaabilah.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 11-2-03 @ 11:24 AM

abu.abdul.azeez
11-05-2003 @ 9:02 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
[deleted... forgot attachment]

This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 11-5-03 @ 9:05 AM

abu.abdul.azeez
11-05-2003 @ 9:03 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? The Latest Warning Against Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh by Muftee il-Junoob Ahmad Bin Yahyaa an-Najmee (with Sound)

Questioner: A questioner from Jordan says: ?I used to go with Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh and slander the Scholars of the Sunnah, then Allaah guided me to the manhaj of truth, so I then became in a struggle with this jamaa?ah which sometimes reached the police. Please advice me, and how should I atone for my slander of the Scholars of Sunnah?"

Shaykh an-Najmee: Atone for what occurred from you by speaking well of the Scholars of the Sunnah and by saying about the people of tableegh what is worthy of being said about them. And they are a Soofee, Deobandee jamaa?ah ? their founder used to sit at the graves, seeking blessings from the people in the graves... [he is] Muhammad Illiyaas. The important thing is that the issue regarding it (Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh) is clear. And this jamaa?ah is a jamaa?ah far-removed from good and from the truth, even if they do desire worship. Nevertheless, how many from the people of groups and parties are from those who desired worship while upon other than the truth and Allaah?s guidance? The groups and parties which spread from a Soofee origin and who have amongst them acts of major shirk continue [upon their way] and consider it to be the truth... (can't understand these final few words)? Yes.

Source:
http://www.sahab.net/sahab/showthread.php?s=&threadid=296952

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 11-5-03 @ 9:17 AM


Attached Filean-Najmee.zip (205 Kbytes)

abu.abdul.azeez
11-05-2003 @ 11:33 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? Shaykh Ahmad an-Najmee: Observations on Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh and Their Innovated, Shirk-Ridden Foundations, Origins, and Practices - Part I

The Shaykh said: We will look at the observations [regarding the Tableegh] with brevity because the speech regarding them has preceded. As for what has not been mentioned from the observations, meaning that which is new, then I will mention it with clarification:

The first observation: The founder of Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh was nurtured upon Soofiyyah and made two oaths (bay?ah) to it[1] and lived upon this until he died. So due to this, he is a Soofee deeply-rooted in Soofiyyah.

The second observation: He used to be stationed at the graves waiting for spiritual revelations and blessings from their occupants.

The third observation: He used to be stationed as the Jishtee supervisor at the grave of ?Abdul-Quddoos al-Kankoohee, who believed in the ideology of the wahdat ul-wujood.[2]

The fourth observation: The Jishtee supervision is to sit at the grave for half an hour of every week while covering the head and making dhikr with this phrase: ?Allaah is in my presence, Allaah is looking over me.? And this action, if is done for Allaah, then it is an innovation, and if it is done out of submissiveness towards the occupant of the grave, then is it major shirk with Allaah. And the latter is more apparent, because if this submissiveness was for Allaah, then he would have done it at the masjid and would not have sat at the grave. So when he sat at the grave with this submissiveness, then this became a proof that he intended by this submissiveness the occupant of the grave.

The fifth observation: The founder of this jamaa?ah and his followers are Soofiyyah in their sulook (way, characteristics) and act upon four orders: the Jishtiyyah, the Naqshabandiyyah, the Sahrawardiyyah, and the Qaadiriyyah.

The sixth observation: That the sitting of the founder of this jamaa?ah by a grave of one who believes in wahdat ul-wujood proves that he believes in this [as well]. And if he did not believe in this, he would not have sat at the grave of one who believes in it in this way, and likewise [show] the submissiveness [towards him]. May Allaah keep us pure from what they have been tested with (i.e. bid?a and shirk).

The seventh observation: That the founder of this jamaa?ah is a Soofee, Qubooree (grave-worshipper), Khuraafee (one who believes in heretical superstitions).

The eighth observation: That their masjid from which their da?wah sprang forth has four graves inside of it. And the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) said: ?From the most evil of the creation are those who take the graves as masaajid. So do not take the graves as masaajid, for indeed, I forbid you from that.? And this hadeeth is in the Saheehayn [of al-Bukhaaree and Muslim].

Source: al-Mawrid al-?Adhb al-Zalaal (p. 284) by way of the following thread on sahab:
http://www.sahab.net/sahab/showthread.php?s=&threadid=287334

--------------------
[1] It has been said that he made oaths to the four major Soofee orders twice. The Shaykh is referring to these two cumulative oaths.
[2] Wahdat ul-wujood is the ideology that states that everything both seen and unseen is Allaah, i.e. the creation and the Creator are actually one and the same. And this is the greatest of kufr, there is no ideology in existence more evil than this and there is no disbeliever more disbelieving than he who ascribes to this ideology. Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan explained in his sharh of Nooniyyah how this ideology verifies and combines all other types of kufr and idolatry into one single madh-hab. He mentioned how even Iblees himself distinguished between the Creator and His creations, as is clear from the Qur?aan, whereas the zanadiqah (heretics) who affirm this filthy madh-hab do not.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 11-15-03 @ 11:11 AM

abu.abdul.azeez
11-07-2003 @ 3:10 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? Shaykh Ahmad an-Najmee: Observations on Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh and Their Innovated, Shirk-Ridden Foundations, Origins, and Practices - Part II

The ninth observation: That the founder of this jamaa?ah believed in al-kashf[1] as is apparent from his statement regarding the tafseer of the verse:

 Aali Imran (3):110

You [true believers in Islmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma'rf (i.e. Islmic Monotheism and all that Islm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islm has forbidden), and you believe in Allh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fsiqn (disobedient to Allh - and rebellious against Allh's Command).


Indeed, he explained it using the Soofee kashf, and it is not permissible to explain the Qur?aan with the Soofee kashf.[2]

The tenth observation: That the Tableegh worship with innovated dhikr (remembrance) upon the Soofee way, and this to separate the statement of tawheed La Ilaaha ila-Allaah.[3]

The eleventh observation: That whosoever cuts off the negation (Laa Ilaaha) from the affirmation (ila-Allaah) intentionally by saying ?Laa Ilaaha? [by itself], then kufr has become necessary upon him due to this. And whoever says ?ila-Allaah? 500 times [by itself] then he has disbelieved 500 times as has been established by ash-Shaykh Hammood at-Tuwayjiree as quoted from the Scholars.

The twelfth observation: That the dhikr in this form, which is what the Soofiyyoon are upon, is an innovation and misguidance, and it is not permissible to worship with it. So whoever says ?La Ilaaha? 500 times then says ?ila-Allaah? 400 times, then indeed, he is a misguided innovator - rather, he is a kaafir because he distinguished the negation from the affirmation. And whosever does this intentionally has disbelieved even if he is ignorant ? he is not to be excused for his ignorance.

Source: al-Mawrid al-?Adhb al-Zalaal (p. 284) by way of the following thread on sahab:
http://www.sahab.net/sahab/showthread.php?s=&threadid=287334

--------------------
[1] Kashf literally means unveiling, uncovering, etc. Used in this context, it is the Soofee concept insinuating that one can receive divine inspiration that ?uncovers the true and hidden meanings? of Qur?aan or Sunnah. Imbedded into this heretical and evil allegation is an implied declaration of prophethood, for a person does not receive divine revelation (wahee) except that he is a prophet. And for one to claim prophethood is major kufr which ejects from the Religion.
[2] Muhammad Illiyaas az-zindeeq al-affaak al-atheem, having neither fear of Allaah nor knowledge of the principles of tafseer and Arabic language, explained the word ?ukhrijat? in this aayah to mean the innovated khurooj which the Tableegh perform to this day. So the defining characteristic of their sect is based upon the satanic whisperings of their founder and not upon any clear text. His son, Yoosuf al-Kandahlawee az-zindeeq, later compiled books full of fabricated and extremely weak ahaadeeth and aathaar in a desperate attempt to prove the validity of his father?s innovated khurooj. May Allaah sever them.
[3] That is, they say ?Laa Ilaaha?, wait an extensive period, then say ?ila-Allaah.? Even worse, they sometimes do not say Laa Ilaaha at all. These innovated adhkaar, as stated by Shaykh Hammood Bin ?Abdullaah at-Tuwayjiree, constitute major kufr and apostasy from Islaam due to what they contain from rejecting the Uloohiyyah of Allaah 'Azz wa Jal. So it becomes clear that these du'aat of fitnah and dalaal actually desire the destruction of tawheed - the very foundation of the da'wah of Prophets and Messengers.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 11-14-03 @ 3:17 PM

abu.abdul.azeez
11-14-2003 @ 11:00 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? Shaykh Ahmad an-Najmee: Observations on Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh and Their Innovated, Shirk-Ridden Foundations, Origins, and Practices - Part III

The fourteenth observation: They make it permissible to carry amulets in which there are talismans and the names of unknown people ? perhaps they are the names of shayaateen (devils) ? and this is not permissible.

The fifteenth observation: They believe that the life of the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) and the lives of the Awliyaa? (saints/pious persons) are worldly lives and not the lives of barzakh.[1]

The sixteenth observation: They are ignorant of Tawheed ul-Uloohiyyah and do not give it any value or any importance in their considerations. This is due to that whose clarification has preceded in the previous observations [of this treatise].

The seventeenth observation: And in Tawheed ul-Asmaa? was-Sifaat, they are Ashaa?irah, Maatureediyyah, even if they do read the hadeeth for blessings.[2]

The eighteenth observation: That their phrases are centered around Tawheed ur-Ruboobiyyah, and [affirming] this tawheed does enter one into Islaam, just as it did not enter the Arab Mushrikeen into it.[3]

The nineteenth observation: That they hate the callers to tawheed, whom they call ?Wahhaabiyyah?[4], such Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Qayyim, and Ibn ?Abdil-Wahhaab. And this indicates their deviance and wickedness.

The twentieth observation: That they do not proclaim the obligation of disbelieving in at-Taaghoot[5] and they do not like it that one should speak about disbelieving in at-Taaghoot. And they hate with a severe hatred that one should speak about this, rather, they will expel him from amongst them.

The twenty-first observation: That they do not forbid the evil and they do not permit a person to forbid any evil. Rather, they consider the stipulations regarding some evils to conflict with wisdom, as they allege. And indeed, Allaah Subhanahu wa Ta?aala censured the Children of Israa?eel and cursed them due to their lack of forbidding the evil. So he said:

 Al-Ma'idah (5):78

Those among the Children of Israel who disbelieved were cursed by the tongue of Dawd (David) and 'Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary). That was because they disobeyed (Allh and the Messengers) and were ever transgressing beyond bounds.


Do you see them as being more knowledgeable or Allaah?

Source: al-Mawrid al-?Adhb al-Zalaal (p. 284) by way of the following thread on sahab:
http://www.sahab.net/sahab/showthread.php?s=&threadid=287334

--------------------
[1] It is the life of the grave which occurs between one?s worldly death and the Day of Resurrection. When a person dies in this life, he passes on to the life of barzakh. The Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) and those who have died from the Awliyaa' are currently living this life of barzakh and not the worldly life.
[2] In their endless quest to devalue knowledge and its importance, the Tableegh adamantly state that they do not read ayaat or ahaadeeth to gain knowledge or understanding, rather, they do so for ?barakah? (blessings only). That is why they only read the last ten suwar from the Qur?aan as has preceded in the fatwa of the Lajnah ? they are not interested in learning the meanings of the Qur'aan nor acting upon it, but rather, they seek blessings by reading only these specific suwar and nothing else. And as the Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) said: ?Whomsoever Allaah desires good for, He gives him understanding of the Religion.? Thus, their having no understanding nor care for understanding indicates that Allaah does not desire good for them. So they achieved neither understanding nor barakah, but rather, humiliation and disgrace for their playing with Allaah?s Deen.
[3] Refer to the first principle of al-Qawaa?id al-Arba? by al-Mujaddid al-Muslih Muhammad Bin ?Abdil-Wahhaab and it various explanations for further insight on this important issue.
[4] This is a derogatory ascription to Muhammad Bin ?Abdil-Wahhaab (d. 1206). In order to justify such an ascription, one must show that the Shaykh brought something new from himself. The Shaykh did not do this, rather, he revived the Religion of Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) and removed the doubts of the Mushrikeen by way of textual proofs from the Book of Allaah, the Sunnah of His Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam), and the statements of the Salaf, as is evident in his works ? most notably Kitaab ut-Tawheed. So the callers of shirk and misguidance tried desperately to defame this Imaam and failed miserably, with the summit of their efforts being the pathetic book ?ad-Durar as-Sunniyyah fir-Radd ?Ala al-Wahhaabiyyah? ? a book filled with such horrendous lies and fabrications that, rather than harming the Shaykh, it only exposed the humiliating status of its author and his likes. Shaykh Saalih Aal ash-Shaykh has delivered more than one excellent lecture clarifying Shaykh ul-Islaam and his da?wah and refuting his critics, so refer to them. It is also sufficient to know that many 'Ulamaa' outside of Najd from his time and after his time praised him, like as-San'aanee, a contemporary of his, Jamaal ud-Deen al-Qaasimee, and many others. As for the head callers of shirk and bida', like the Muhammad Illiyaas, then the 'Ulamaa' have not only not praised them, but have extensively exposed and refuted them, as this thread proves.
[5] A Taaghoot is anything worshipped alongside/instead of Allaah 'Azz wa Jal, except if the object of worship was a pious Muwahhid, such as 'Eesa Bin Maryam (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam), al-'Uzayr (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam), al-Husayn, 'Abdul-Qaadir al-Jeelaanee, etc. In that case, the Taaghoot becomes Satan, who is responsible for deceiving the people and calling them to this shirk.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 11-15-03 @ 11:12 AM

abu.abdul.azeez
11-15-2003 @ 11:13 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? Shaykh Ahmad an-Najmee: Observations on Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh and Their Innovated, Shirk-Ridden Foundations, Origins, and Practices - Part IV

The twenty-second observation: The statement of the founder of this jamaa?ah: ?So the intention of Laa Ilaaha ila-Allaah is eliminating the false certainty regarding various things from the heart and inserting the correct certainty regarding the Self (dhaat) of Allaah.? The understanding of this is the belief in wahdat ul-wujood, and it is that the false certainty according to them is that which every Muslim believes ? that everything we see, hear, touch, and notice is created except for the Speech of Allaah (the Qur?aan), for it is an attribute from the attributes which is uncreated, and that Allaah is the Creator of this entire existence, the Owner of it, and the Ruler of it, and He with His Self has ascended His throne, distinct from His creations, and that His Knowledge is in every place. So this ?aqeedah is false according to the people of wahdat ul-wujood, and its beliefs are false beliefs and are corrupt according to them. And the correct certainty regarding the Self of Allaah [according to them] is that He has not ascended the throne, and that the Lord is everything that we see from the creations, as I have previously clarified and as their speech, declarations, and [the statements] which have come from them have proven.

And on top of this, the meaning of Laa Ilaaha ila-Allaah [according to them] is that ?There is nothing in existence except Allaah.? And this is negating the existence of every existing thing except for Allaah the Exalted, and Allaah is Exalted above their statement with a great highness.

The twenty-third observation: Their beliefs regarding dreams, miracles, stories, and superstitions, and that so-and-so went on khurooj [with the Tableegh] from his family, closed the door on them, and stayed with them (the Tableegh) for 4 months. Then he returned to them and found them in a better condition [than they were in before he went on khurooj], so he asked them and they told him that an old woman entered upon them and served them. And I have heard similar to this from some of them with my own ears, and they allege that this is a miracle which proves that their action is loved by Allaah ?Azz wa Jal.[1]

The twenty-fourth observation: That the founder of this jamaa?ah appointed himself a legislator [of religion], so he legislated for his followers these six pillars or six attributes. So he legislated for them khurooj 3 days, or 10 days, or 4 days, or 4 months, etc. And he prepared a legislation for his followers, and if his followers agree upon that which he drew out for them and do not neglect it, then they have made him a legislator for them, since they have traversed upon the line which he drew out for them, [which consists] of that which has preceded (i.e. the khurooj) and other than it, such as not proclaiming the disbelief in at-Taaghoot, not forbidding the evil, and other than this.

The twenty-fifth observation: What ash-Shaykh Hammood at-Tuwayjiree has mentioned, quoting from Professor Sayf ur-Rahmaan Bin Ahmad in his book, ?Nadhrah ?Ibaarah I?tibaariyyah ?an al-Jamaa?at it-Tableeghiyyah,? that they have resemblance to the Shee?ah in many affairs. So he said:

And indeed, Sayf ur-Rahmaan mentioned many types of similarities between the Tableegh and the Shee?ah in his book. And whosoever resembles a people is amongst them. And this is a summary of what he mentioned, so he said: ?And from that which is noticed [about the Tableegh] is that they have resemblance to the Shee?ah in covering-up poison with grease, and they have resemblance to the Shee?ah in covering-up that which is in their books.

And they have resemblance to the Shee?ah in covering-up many of their far-removed beliefs (i.e. far-removed from the sunnah) in terms of ghuloo, dalaal, and the extremism which is far-removed [from the sunnah].

And they have resemblance to the Shee?ah in terms of [using] deception in the name of wisdom and carefulness, such that they make something apparent and hide something else, divert the speech from its proper context, and say one thing and do something else.[2]

And they have resemblance to the Shee?ah in their false interpretations which are far-removed from the way of the Salaf us-Saalih.

And they have resemblance to the Shee?ah in their being far-removed from the texts and from the knowledge of the texts.

And they have resemblance to the Shee?ah in limiting their knowledge and the knowledge of their sect to their books which are well-known with them and nothing besides them from the books and nothing besides them from the Scholars of the Muslimeen.[3]

And they have resemblance to the Shee?ah in preventing their followers from research and seeking the truth from other than themselves.

And they have resemblance to the Shee?ah in making the majority of the religion limited to the virtues and faults and placing great emphasis on the major sins.

And they have resemblance to the Shee?ah in [improperly] appraising the fallacies and exaggerations.

And they have resemblance to the Shee?ah in [improperly] appraising nifaaq (hypocrisy), manifesting tawheed, and obscuring shirk ? rather ? the call to tawheed and spreading of shirk.? [End of Shaykh Hammood?s speech as well?]

Then he mentioned in the same page the manifestations of resemblance between them and the Qaadiyaaniyyeen as well, quoted from the book of Sayf ur-Rahmaan Ahmad, ?Nadhrah ?Ibaarah I?tibaariyyah ?an al-Jamaa?at it-Tableeghiyyah.? So whosoever desires further elaboration, then let him return to these two books or one of them, and Allaah is the Giver of Success to whomever he desires from His servants and He is the One Who Guides to the straight path.

Source: al-Mawrid al-?Adhb al-Zalaal (p. 284) by way of the following thread on sahab, and it is the final part of this four-part series:
http://www.sahab.net/sahab/showthread.php?s=&threadid=287334

--------------------
[1] And this is just a small sample of what the Tableegh resort to in order to justify their innovations. There any many, many more similarly-absurd tales widespread amongst the Tableegh which are more ridiculous and outrageous than that mentioned above. It is also interesting to note how you may hear the exact same story from two different members of the Tableegh in two different places in the world, only that the settings and characters have conveniently changed to suit the specific audience!
[2] He is referring to their picking and choosing the good which they enjoin the evil which they forbid. As has been mentioned previously, they hide rulings on various issues and do not forbid the evil in the name of wisdom ? in reality, this is mere deception designed to enlist more members into their sect. And this type of deception is commonplace with the Shee?ah, rather, it is the foundation of their sect, as they are known to openly admit: ?Our religion is deception.?
[3] They almost exclusively use ?Fadaa?il ul-A?maal? and ?Hayaat us-Sahaabah?, both by Muhammad Yoosuf al-Kandahlawee, whose grave is now a wathan buried in the Tableegh's primary masjid. In the Arab world, however, they also use ?Riyaadh us-Saaliheen? in order to gain acceptance with what is generally a more astute audience.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 11-15-03 @ 2:15 PM

abu.abdul.azeez
11-15-2003 @ 5:43 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan: The Tableegh are Enemies of the Salafee Da?wah and Part of the Most Severe Ideological Attack Against It

The Shaykh said: Indeed, the enemies of this da?wah have tried to demolish it by force and were not given success. And they tried to demolish it by creating suspicions, misguiding others, creating doubts, and describing it with repulsive descriptions, but this did not increase it in anything but radiance, clarity, and acceptance.

And from the latest of what we are living through now is the arrival of strange, dubious ideologies to our lands in the name of da?wah upon the hands of groups named with different names, such as Jamaa?at ul-Ikhwaan ul-Muslimeen, Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh, and Jamaa?at this and that. And their goal is one, and it is to remove the da?wah of tawheed and take its place.

And the reality is that the intent of these groups does not differ from the intent of those who preceded them from the enemies of this blessed da?wah ? all of them desire the demolishment of it, but the difference is in the approach?

?And if not, then if these groups truly desire da?wah to Allaah, then why do they overlook their own lands from which they came to us, since they are in greater need of da?wah and rectification? They overlook them and invade the lands of tawheed, desiring to transform its correct reformatory way into a crooked way, and desiring the deception of its youth and the establishment of fitnah and enmity between them?

And these groups did indeed deceive some of the youths. So they were affected by their ideologies, and they rejected their societies, and they doubted their Jurists and Scholars, and they extinguished within them the zeal towards ?aqeedah, and they started speaking randomly with that which they did not know, and sounding off on whatever they heard.

Yet indeed, in these lands ? and praise is to Allaah ? are men who show zeal towards their religion, defend their ?aqeedah, strike down the plots of the enemies to their deaths, and are not affected by false enthusiasm.

And if the enthusiastic writers and speakers from our youth are warning from the ideological attack, then what ideological attack is more severe than this attack? So the obligation is to give importance to opposing it and to stand it its face.

Source: The prologue of the book ?Haqeeqat ud-Da?wah ila Allaah? by Shaykh Sa?d al-Husayn, by way of the following thread on sahab:
http://www.sahab.net/sahab/showthread.php?s=&threadid=290382

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 11-15-03 @ 6:01 PM

abu.abdul.azeez
11-19-2003 @ 5:28 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? The Religion is Advice: An Essay on Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh by Shaykh Faalih Bin Naafi? al-Harbee ? Arabic Download

A point-by-point exposition of Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh by the Mujaahid, the Honorable Shaykh Faalih Bin Naafi' al-Harbee. A translation in parts is soon to follow, in shaa? Allaah.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 11-19-03 @ 5:37 AM


Attached Filefaalih.zip (24 Kbytes)

abu.abdul.azeez
11-20-2003 @ 4:03 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? The Religion is Advice: An Essay on Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh by Shaykh Faalih Bin Naafi? al-Harbee ? English Translation - Part I


All Praise to Allaah the Lord of All the Worlds. O Allaah, grant Your salaah and salaam upon Your Servant and Messenger, Muhammad, and upon all of his family and companions and those who follow them with perfection until the Day of Judgement.

Allaah Ta?aala said:

 Al-Ma'idah (5):2

O you who believe! Violate not the sanctity of the Symbols of Allh, nor of the Sacred Month, nor of the animals brought for sacrifice, nor the garlanded people or animals, etc. [Marked by the garlands on their necks made from the outer part of the treestems (of Makkah) for their security], nor the people coming to the Sacred House (Makkah), seeking the bounty and good pleasure of their Lord. But when you finish the Ihrm (of Hajj or 'Umrah), you may hunt, and let not the hatred of some people in (once) stopping you from AlMasjidalHarm (at Makkah) lead you to transgression (and hostility on your part). Help you one another in AlBirr and AtTaqwa (virtue, righteousness and piety); but do not help one another in sin and transgression. And fear Allh. Verily, Allh is Severe in punishment.


And He Ta?aala said:

 Aali Imran (3):103

And hold fast, all of you together, to the Rope of Allh (i.e. this Qur'n), and be not divided among yourselves, and remember Allh's Favour on you, for you were enemies one to another but He joined your hearts together, so that, by His Grace, you became brethren (in Islmic Faith), and you were on the brink of a pit of Fire, and He saved you from it. Thus Allh makes His Ayt (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.,) clear to you, that you may be guided.


And He Ta?aala said:

 Az-Zukhruf (43):44

And verily, this (the Qur'n) is indeed a Reminder for you (O Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam)) and your people (Quraish people, or your followers), and you will be questioned (about it).


And the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) said: ?The Religion is advice??[1]

And in the hadeeth of Jareer Bin ?Abdullaah al-Bajalee is that from the things to which he made an oath with the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) is ??advice to every Muslim,?[2] meaning to every Muslim who seeks the truth, who has zeal towards his religion, who advises himself, who is a defender standing up for the correct ?aqeedah, who traverses the sound way of the Salaf us-Saalih. as-Salaamu ?Alaykum wa Rahmatullah wa Barakaatuh, to proceed:

So indeed, these lands, which have been founded upon the tawheed of Allaah Ta?aala, are open in their ?aqeedah and envied for their security in which one can live in comfort. [This is] due to the grace of Allaah firstly then due to their ruling according to the Sharee?ah of Allaah in their ?aqeedah, worship, judgments, characteristics, mannerisms, and the rest of their affairs. And indeed, the enemies of the ?aqeedah have been persistent in their enmity [of these lands] due to that which they (the enemies) broadcast from calls of misguidance, deformed realities, and what is similar to that from what has been broadcasted by the trumpets of the Raafidah, Soofiyyah, and whoever travels in their direction from the deviants upon their different methodologies and various sects. So they are agreed upon the resistance of the ?aqeedah of tawheed and the enmity of its people wherever they encamp and wherever they are found.

And when they failed in these false calls, they resorted to a different, more severe technique ? and it is to attack this society under the veil of da?wah to Islaam and in the form of various partisan societies. Each party (hizb) adopted a specific methodology in their da?wah which did not agree ? neither from near nor afar ? with the methodology which the Prophets and Messengers traversed - and at their head, their last and most superior, our Prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) - and nor with the methodology of the Salaf us-Saalih from the Sahaabah and Taabi?een and those who followed them with perfection in terms of concentrating on spreading the ?aqeedah of tawheed and giving importance to all of the principles of Islaam, from the fundamental matters to the subsidiary branches. Rather, these varying groups, methodologies, and ideologies are agreed upon not speaking about tawheed, alleging that it splits the Ummah, just as they do not place importance on seeking shar?ee knowledge, nor gaining understanding of it, nor spreading it. And what is important to them is implementing a specific hizbee (partisan) methodology upon which they show loyalty and disownment. And therefore, it becomes obligatory upon whoever has knowledge[3] to bring this forward so as to stop the evil of these groups or to reduce it. And there is no quittance except by this.

And from these groups is the jamaa?ah which has called itself Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh, and it is a jamaa?ah which is Maatureedee, Ash?aree in its ?aqeedah and Soofee, Khuraafee (superstitious) in its characteristics, resistant to the true ?aqeedah of tawheed, ignorant and causing ignorance in their way and principles.

--------------------
[1] Reported by Muslim, Abee Daawood, Ahmad, and others.
[2] Reported by al-Bukhaaree, Muslim, an-Nasaa?ee, at-Tirmidhee, Ahmad, and others.
[3] [Notice how the Shaykh says that it obligatory upon everyone with knowledge of these affairs to prevent their evil. The Ikhwaan, more specifically the Mumayyi?oon, created confusion in this arena by equating this with jarh of the narrators of hadeeth, thus limiting this type of criticism to the Scholars only, and stipulating that before criticizing any specific group or individual, one must consult with the Scholars, even if their affair is clearer than the sun on a cloudless day. And this is falsehood, for this type of criticism is not analogous to jarh of the narrators of hadeeth, rather, it merely al-amru bil-ma?roof wan-nahee ?an il-munkar (enjoining the good and forbidding the evil), and it is binding upon all those who have the knowledge and capability of doing so.]

NOTE: Any footnote contained within brackets [] is from me, the translator, whereas everything else is from the original Arabic document posted above.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 11-22-03 @ 7:48 AM

abu.abdul.azeez
11-20-2003 @ 11:31 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? The Religion is Advice: An Essay on Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh by Shaykh Faalih Bin Naafi? al-Harbee ? English Translation - Part II

And whoever is deceived by this jamaa?ah, then it is only because he saw what they have in terms effecting the commoners and sinners. And the reality is that this is a temporary effect, for they remove him from sins and enter him into shirk, bida?, and tasawwuf (Soofee practices) from directions which he may or may not perceive. And with this severe technique, they succeeded in leveraging many of the commoners and ignoramuses. And from the things that helped them in doing this is that they move them towards spiritual exercises and spend their time traveling the earth and performing the khurooj which they call jihaad. And they always repeat the weak hadeeth: ??we returned from the minor jihaad to the major jihaad.?[1] And they interpreted the texts about jihaad in the path of Allaah to take this meaning, and they aborted the true principle of jihaad under the veil of the sufficiency of performing jihaad against oneself in this age. And in this is a severe Soofee principle, which is to abort the foundation of Islaam in terms of the tawheed of Allaah Ta?aala, jihaad in the path of Allaah, knowledge, and educating.

And from their severe principles is their not meddling in speech regarding ?aqeedah, nor Islaamic politics, nor the points of difference, neither in the fundamentals nor the subsidiary branches, just as they impose these conditions upon their followers. And any individual or jamaa?ah which leaves this manhaj is openly shown hostility and alienated, especially those who call to tawheed. And this manhaj undoubtedly and unquestionably serves the enemies of Islaam.[2] Thus, they boast about  the fact that they have entered every land in the world, amongst them Russia and Israel. And this issue by itself calls for questioning and suspicion ? can anyone imagine that the enemies of Islaam would be pleased to strengthen these people in performing da?wah in their lands if indeed they were calling to the true Islaam?

Rather, the reality is that this da?wah serves them (the Kuffaar) in their objectives due to its aborting jihaad in the path of Allaah ? and this is what the enemies of Islaam long for. Added to this is the fact that this da?wah, which arose from the lands of India about 80 years ago and spread to various lands, if it was a true da?wah to Allaah, then where is its effect on the manifestation of shirk and idolatry which is spread throughout the lands of the Muslims and exemplified by the worship of graves and the acts of devotion near them, the sacrifices and vows made to them, the du?aa (invocation) of their inhabitants, and other than that ? especially in the lands from which this da?wah started and resides, such as India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh?! All the while, this manifestation [of shirk] spreads within the view and hearing of Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh, who have reached millions yet have not changed this even one bit - rather, they do not reject this - rather, they actually partake in these rituals with others. And to them, all of mankind has committed shirk by loving the worldly life - except for the Tableegh.[3] So they alone are free from this shirk. And they derive this corrupt, bogus belief by way of their statement: ?Love of the worldly life is the head of every evil.?[4] And they allege that this a hadeeth yet it is not a hadeeth, rather, it is nothing but a fabrication and lie upon the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam). And we are not talking about individuals here, rather, we are interested in this narrow manhaj upon which they have traversed, and that it is a manhaj which is not in conformity with the manhaj of the Prophets of Messengers in da?wah to Allaah Ta?aala, and [we are also interested in] the extent of the effect of this manhaj upon individuals.

--------------------
[1] al-Khateeb reported it in his history [of Baghdaad], as did ad-Daarimee and al-Bayhaqee in ?az-Zuhd.? The latter graded it weak, as did al-?Iraaqee, as-Suyootee, and other than them.
[2] [And  this is why, as mentioned by Shaykh Muqbil, they were allowed to enter the communist lands during the peak of communism and this is why the French would not permit him to come perform da?wah except under the name of Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh. And even in these so-called times of ?maximum security?, we see that groups of Tableegh from the subcontinent and Arab world (many of whom have criminal records and dubious backgrounds) easily obtain visas and hold large conferences in the United States and Canada with no resistance.]
[3] And they say that the people in Saudi Arabia, even if they boast about not worshipping graves and rocks and calling upon other than Allaah, etc., have indeed regressed towards the worship of the worldly life and shirk with regards to the comfort of the worldly life. And indeed, a group of trustworthy Saudi individuals who made a pledge of allegiance to the head of Tableeghee da?wah in India have testified that he dictates to them during the pledge of allegiance: ?Say: I repent from shirk.? And the last of which they make them pledge allegiance to is loyalty only to the Tableeghee da?wah, loyalty to whoever shows loyalty to it, enmity towards whoever shows enmity to it, defending it, and spending life in its path. Then they pledge allegiance upon the four-part chain, which is the pledge of allegiance of In?aam ul-Hasan to Muhammad Illiyaas. And this four-part chain is a simultaneous pledge of allegiance to four Soofee orders: al-Jishtiyyah, an-Naqshabandiyyah, al-Qaadiriyyah, and as-Sahrawardiyyah. And what the Naqshabandiyyah possess from misguidance is sufficient without these other orders, so what if it is combined with them? [From those trustworthy Saudi individuals who reached the level of pledging allegiance to this jamaa?ah is ?Abbaas al-Sharqaawee, whose many writings and statements on the Tableegh will be posted later in this thread, in shaa? Allaah. The testimonies of those who went out with the Tableegh and later abandoned them have been purposely delayed because precedence has been given to the writings and statements of the Senior Scholars.]
[4] al-Bayhaqee reported it in ?ash-Shu?ab.? as-San?aanee judged it to be fabricated as did Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah and as-Suyootee.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 11-21-03 @ 4:02 PM

abu.abdul.azeez
11-25-2003 @ 1:45 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? The Religion is Advice: An Essay on Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh by Shaykh Faalih Bin Naafi? al-Harbee ? English Translation ? Part III

And it is possible for us to clarify the condition of this manhaj in the following statements, and we will enumerate them with brevity:

1. The foundation of the Tableegh is Soofee: they pledge allegiance to the [four major Soofee] orders and do not see guidance except in them.

2. They take the pledge of allegiance (bay?ah) to the orders from all of their followers except for the Arabs and the people of the Haramayn (i.e. the two sacred places - Makkah and Madeenah).

3. The current head of the jamaa?ah, In?aam al-Hasan, acknowledged this bay?ah in a letter to Shaykh Sa?d al-Husayyin and claimed that it is a bay?ah of tawbah (repentance).

4. The testimony of Sa?d Bin ?Abdur-Rahmaan al-Husayyin regarding the head of the Tableegh in the Kingdom [of Saudi Arabia], Sa?eed Ahmad, that he confessed to taking the pledge of allegiance from some of the Saudis to them (the Tableegh).

5. The individuals who made bay?ah to In?aam al-Hasan, the head of the Tableegh who is present in Delhi, India at their headquarters, confess [to having made bay?ah to him]. And [their headquarters] has in it the grave of the founder of the jamaa?ah, Muhammad Illiyaas, his son and successor Muhammad Yoosuf, and the graves of other than them from their family. And they are in corner, within the walls of the masjid of the jamaa?ah, and they (the Tableegh) single them out with specific rituals.[1]

6. The Shaykhs of the Tableegh, upon conducting the bay?ah, warn their followers from the correct ?aqeedah and call them (i.e. those who follow the correct ?aqeedah) Wahhaabiyyah. And they point out their own corrupt ?aqeedah to them, and state that the differences between themselves and the Wahhaabiyyah are in ?aqeedah. And from the things they point out to them are the life of the Prophets, which they believe is a true, worldly life and not a life of barzakh, the permissibility of tawassul through the ?selves? of the Prophets and Righteous[2] and seeking aid (al-istighaathah) from them, etc.

--------------------
[1] [According to the eyewitness account of Shaykh Rabee' posted earlier in this thread, these graves are worshipped clearly and openly. It is also clear from a seperate audio recording of Shaykh Faalih that he has witnessed these same acts of shirk during a visit to the Tableeghee headquarters as well - Allaah knows best whether or not he accompanied Shaykh Rabee' or conducted a seperate visit.]
[2] [Tawassul is the act of using someone or something as a means of nearness to Allaah. Some types of tawassul are permissible, such as tawassul through one?s righteous deeds or through the Names and Attributes of Allaah, whereas other types of tawassul, such as those referred to here, constitute major shirk which nullifies one?s Islaam. Refer to the second nullifier from ?Nawaaqid ul-Islaam? of Shaykh Muhammad Bin ?Abdil-Wahhaab or Shaykh ?Abdul-?Azeez Bin Baaz and their respective explanations for further clarity on this topic.]

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 11-25-03 @ 2:07 AM

abu.abdul.azeez
12-06-2003 @ 10:47 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? The Religion is Advice: An Essay on Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh by Shaykh Faalih Bin Naafi? al-Harbee ? English Translation ? Part IV

7. The individual who desires his pledge of allegiance passes through an examination phase in front of the Shaykhs of the Tableegh which reaches the level of worship in obedience ? rather, committing what Allaah has made forbidden by order of the Shaykh or making forbidden what Allaah has made permissible[1], to the extent of fearing annihilation by way of calamities, tribulations, misguidance, deviance, and the most severe affairs for whoever opposes the Shaykh. And the ruling is the opposite for whoever blindly obeys the Shaykhs ? so he is the guided and successful one and the one safe from fitnah, etc.

8. They change the life of the follower from head to heel in every way ? in ?aqeedah, manhaj, sulook (way and characteristics), fikr (ideology), and other than that.

9. They established six attributes: they made memorization of them obligatory for followers and put them in place of the pillars of Eemaan and pillars of Islaam and its fundamentals. From these six attributes is the pure statement that La Ilaaha ila-Allaah, and its meaning according to them is: ??eliminating the false certainty regarding various things from the heart and inserting the correct certainty regarding the Self (dhaat) of Allaah.? And they explain it as being tawheed ur-ruboobiyyah, i.e. there is no beneficiary nor harmer except Allaah Ta?aala, etc.

And from them is honoring the Muslim[2]: and they explain this attribute as whoever bares witness that La Ilaaha ila-Allaah is a Muslim, regardless of what his actions are and even if he commits shirk and does everything that nullifies the shahaadah. And whosever is not like this, then he (according to them) is strict and cruel, rather, he is a khaarijee who makes takfeer of the Muslims. And likewise, they explain the remainder of the six attributes with explanations that demolish Islaam or apply them in such as way that conflicts with the reality of the tawheed. And indeed, we found amongst their followers in our lands those who memorize these six principles and apply them, so when we asked him about the pillars of Islaam and Eemaan, we found that he did not know them.[3]

--------------------
[1] Muhammad Zakariyyaah, one of the majors leaders of Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh, wrote in ?Tableeghee Nisaab? (now called Fadaa?il ul-A?maal) on page 31: ?Favor your Shaykh over yourself by doing whatever he desires, for giving preference to yourself is not befitting. And be hasty in obedience to his orders and abstaining from whatever he forbids you from doing, even if he orders you to commit adultery (zinaa) ? do it as per his order, not your pleasure." [This, as Shaykh Faalih alluded to, is shirk ut-taa?ah, i.e. shirk in obedience, and it is amongst the major shirk which ejects from the religion and nullifies one?s Islaam. Shaykh ul-Islaam Muhammad Bin ?Abdil-Wahhaab said: ?The third [type of major shirk] is shirk ut-taa?ah, and the evidence is the statement of Allaah Ta?aala:

 At-Tawbah (9):31

They (Jews and Christians) took their rabbis and their monks to be their lords besides Allh (by obeying them in things which they made lawful or unlawful according to their own desires without being ordered by Allh), and (they also took as their Lord) Messiah, son of Maryam (Mary), while they (Jews and Christians) were commanded [in the Taurt (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel)) to worship none but One Ilh (God - Allh) L ilha illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He)[]. Praise and glory be to Him, (far above is He) from having the partners they associate (with Him)."


And the tafseer of this regarding which there is no confusion is: obeying the scholars and worshippers in committing disobedience [to Allaah], as the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) explained to ?Adiyy Bin Haatim when he asked him and said: ?We do not worship them.? So he (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) mentioned to him that their worship is by obeying them in committing disobedience [to Allaah].? Taken from "al-Waajibaat al-Mutahatimaat" as compiled by Imaam ?Abdullaah al-Qar?aawee.]
[2] [As Muhammad al-Haajiree mentioned when discussing this issue, where is their honor for those Salafiyyoon and ?Ulamaa? who warned against their innovations and misguidance? Furthermore, where was their honor for Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan and Hammaad al-Ansaaree, when they disrespected these two A?imah by needlessly leaving their lectures? Or do they just honor those who are either sympathetic to them, ignorant of their reality, or silent about their hideous deviations due to hizbiyyah? The truth is, the Tableegh show no honor towards those most deserving of being honored, and they are Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa?ah and their ?Ulamaa?. And their filthy, vulgar behavior towards Ahl us-Sunnah has become commonplace in our times ? there are first-hand accounts on sahab which mention how the Tableegh physically attacked some brothers, labeled others as Shayaateen (devils), and committed other abominable acts not befitting for a group which claims to honor the Muslims.]
[3] [And this is not an isolated case, rather, it is common that a Tableeghee would not know the five pillars of Islaam nor the six pillars of Eemaan, yet would simultaneously speak openly in the masaajid and make da?wah. Can the one who does not possess something give it to others?]

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 12-7-03 @ 1:37 PM

abu.abdul.azeez
12-09-2003 @ 7:27 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? The Religion is Advice: An Essay on Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh by Shaykh Faalih Bin Naafi? al-Harbee ? English Translation ? Part V

10. They send out whoever ascribes to the jamaa?ah, [stating] that he is pious caller, and that he is doing what the ?Ulamaa? [of Ahl us-Sunnah] are not doing, even if he is amongst the most ignorant of the ignoramuses. And there is found in their hearts a hatred towards the ?Ulamaa? and a love for the Shaykhs of the Tableegh, and they warn against listening to anyone but them. Nonetheless, it is befitting that we know that the terminology of the Tableegh in granting the name ?Shaykh? or ?Mashaayikh? differs from our terminology: so the well-experienced caller who went to India and Pakistan, conducted various travels (i.e. khurooj for the specified periods of time), practiced the entire manhaj in da?wah of the Tableegh and was loyal to it, and so on, then he is the Shaykh according to them, even if he is amongst the most ignorant of the ignoramuses. And the reference points are the Indian Shaykhs who are upon this manhaj.

11. Their hatred of the people of ?aqeedah and the Imaams of the Salafee da?wah, and their complete hatred of Shaykh Muhammad Bin ?Abdil-Wahhaab, may Allaah have mercy on him, and his followers who carried the da?wah. So they accuse them of ignorance and stupidity, and that they are Khawaarij, and that they make takfeer of the Muslims, as is written in Kitaab ush-Shihaab uth-Thaaqib by Husayn Ahmad, one of the major Imaams of the jamaa?ah (p. 42). So he said: ?Know that Muhammad Bin ?Abdil-Wahhaab made his affair apparent in the beginning 13th century, and that he had corrupt beliefs bogus opinions. As such, he killed and fought against Ahl us-Sunnah and forced them to speak ill of his ?aqeedah and opinions, and he used to make lawful the pillaging of their wealth, and he thought that, in killing them, there was reward and recompense ? especially the people of Hijaaz, for indeed, he harmed them in the most severe way. And he used to insult the Salaf us-Saalih and speak about their status in the most evil manner, and many of them were called to account by his hand. In conclusion, he is a tyrannical oppressor and sinning murderer, thus, the Arabs hated him more severely than the Jews and Christians??

And Anwar Shaah al-Kashmeeree, also one of their Imaams, said in Faydh ul-Baaree (1/170): ?As for Muhammad Bin Abdil-Wahhaab an-Najdee, then he was a stupid man with little knowledge, so he used to hurry to pass judgments of kufr. And it is not befitting [for anyone] to dive into this valley (i.e. takfeer), except for he who is precise and knowledgeable of kufr and its causes.?

As such, the Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh believe that the way of the Salaf in passing judgments of shirk upon the mushrikeen, innovation upon the innovators, and so on is harsh and severe, and that it is a fruitless way, and that it is not from the wisdom in da?wah. And the da?wah of the Tableegh prevents differentiation between the muwahhid (monotheist) and the mushrik (polytheist), innovator, and sinner. So the manhaj according to them is leaving the people upon what they believe, since the important issue according to them is carrying out the rituals and the specific principles upon which their da?wah is based.

13. Their allegation that tawheed and ahkaam are causes of dissension, and that teaching them and calling to them divides the Muslims and repels them from the da?wah, and that it is not from the wisdom in calling to Allaah. And this is nothing but scattering ashes into the eyes, such that their enmity towards the manhaj of the Salaf followed in our lands is not exposed.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 12-9-03 @ 7:33 PM

abu.abdul.azeez
12-12-2003 @ 1:22 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? The Religion is Advice: An Essay on Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh by Shaykh Faalih Bin Naafi? al-Harbee ? English Translation ? Part VI

14. They do not forbid the evil ? ever ? and they openly admit that. And they do not enjoin the good in the correct manner, and they believe that the forbiddance of evil repels the Muslims and divides them, and that it is not from the wisdom in calling to Allaah.

15. They teach their followers many corrupt things from their ?aqeedah, amongst which are: that at-tawakkul (trust in Allaah) is not completed except by abandoning al-asbaab (the means by which things come about) by claiming that they have no effect, and that performing al-asbaab damages the validity of at-tawakkul[1]. And with this they affected many people, such that they abandoned their governmental jobs and their business-related activities. And they affected the youth, such that they abandoned their knowledge-based studies with the claim of at-tawakkul, and that, for whoever goes out in this da?wah and practiced its manhaj, everything will suffice for him and his provision will come from places which he perceives not, even if he doesn?t do any work. And the affair does not stop at this level, rather, they have been able to affect the young children, such that they removed them from their schools and classrooms and away from their fathers, mothers, and families, and they performed khurooj with them upon their way.

And what results from this in terms of waste, misguidance, corruption, and what results from the khurooj of those youths in terms of corruptions and perils is known, [yet] only Allaah knows their extent.

16. They fill the minds of their followers with stories which are all lies. And all of the miracles which they claim and all of the khuraafaat (superstitions) which they spin up and attribute to Islaam are false and slanderous. And they support their claims with weak and fabricated ahaadeeth, and the goal of this is sticking to and associating with the da?wah and its Shaykhs and leaders as well as their distinguishing between everything with which they associate.[2]

17. In Asmaa? and Sifaat (the Names and Attributes of Allaah 'Azz wa Jal), they teach them the beliefs of the Maatureediyyah and Ashaa?irah, and they reject the fact that tawheed ul-?ibaadah (the tawheed of worship) is the meaning of Laa Ilaaha ila-Allaah.

--------------------
[1] [And this is a heinous lie upon Allaah ?Azz wa Jal, for the belief in al-asbaab is from the ?aqeedah of Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa?ah. Refer to this article. Aside from what is mentioned by Shaykh ul-Islaam and Ibn Sa?dee in the aforementioned article, Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan also refuted the falsehood of such innovators by mentioning how the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) used to prepare strategies, wear armor, and wield a scimitar when preparing for and fighting in various battles ? yet, despite his performing these asbaab, he was still the most trusting in Allaah of all mankind.]
[2] [That is, their intent in spreading these stories and superstitions is causing their followers and potential recruits to be even more attracted and participant in their activities. As such, some of their stories are meant to scare unsuspecting people into joining them, whereas others are meant to make the Tableegh appear ?miraculous? and ?blessed?, thus fooling the foolish into going khurooj with them. And these are all shameless tactics used by those who lack any textual evidence for their forged manaahij ? in fact, these tactics are common with Christian missionaries, who regularly resort to story-telling, narrations of false miracles, and other khuraafaat to gain converts.]

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 12-12-03 @ 4:16 AM

abu.abdul.azeez
12-14-2003 @ 12:28 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? The Religion is Advice: An Essay on Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh by Shaykh Faalih Bin Naafi? al-Harbee ? English Translation ? Part VII

18. They closely surround them with authority figures and supervisors and instill fear in them, perhaps until they lose their mind or are on the verge of losing their mind.

19. They show bigotry to the Hanafee madh-hab with an abominable, blind sort of bigotry, such that they do not accept the texts and proofs from the Book and Sunnah if they differ with the madh-hab.

20. They believe in the misguidance and lack of eemaan of everyone who fails to enter the da?wah of the Tableegh, and that all of the Muslims are the object of their da?wah ? exactly like the Kuffaar.

21. Some of the people only notice their effect on the sinners, but the reality is that they have an effect on the upright people as well but in a greater way ? especially in our lands, for they removed them from the upright manhaj of the Salaf and assigned them to the fruitless manhaj of the Tableegh, which is founded upon innovation and misguidance.

22. Some of the people imagine that they are [only] slight ignoramuses and that they do not create evils for anyone. And the truth and reality is that they are callers who, in the foundations of their heretically-superstitious da?wah, deliberately hold tightly to these foundations without looking to the legislative proofs and knowledge. And what opposes them is discarded by the jamaa?ah [only] because it is in opposition to these fundamentals. And they have a severe principle, and it is that the end goal justifies the means[1]. So they believe in the permissibility of arriving to their goals even by committing acts which oppose the shar? (legislation), such as lying, forgery, and false promises. So they dislike that they should promise to change what they are upon and what is in their books in terms of tasawwuf, misguidance, lying, and other than that from that which does not agree with the Religion, and they do not keep their promises.

And whatever a person possesses from characteristics
Even if he imagines that they are hidden from the people, they are known

23. They say that the people, except for the Tableegh, are being put to trail: the rulers are put to trail by their leadership, the businessmen are put to trail by their business, the employees are put to trail by their jobs, and so on. And [they claim that] the Scholars have not benefited from their knowledge, have remained at ease, and have abandoned da?wah and khurooj, thus they are being put to trail. And they say to whoever follows them amongst the ignoramuses and their likes: ?As for you, then Allaah has protected you from the trials and has granted you eemaan, and with your little knowledge, you have sacrificed the worldly-life and have abandoned it and its people, and have performed khurooj in the path of Allaah. And thus, you all have an effect on the people because your speech, which comes from the heart, enters into the heart.?[2]

--------------------
[1] [This ?principle of kufr? ? as named by Imaam al-Albaanee ? is attributed to the Italian Nicolo Machiavelli (d. 1527 C.E.) and it is the fundamental operating principle for many secret societies and heretical cults, such as the Freemasons, Illuminati, and their various derivatives. The misguided innovators of this Ummah also base their activities on this principle, with the prime example being the Ikhwaan and their seedlings, such as the Qutubiyyah and Surooriyyah, all of whom are structurally and operationally similar to the aforementioned secret societies. May Allaah sever them all.]
[2] [And the Tableegh claim that, while Ahl us-Sunnah might speak with knowledge in their da'wah, they speak with the ?heart?, and that this is why so many people embrace their da?wah. And the reality is, people embrace their da?wah because, like Shaykh Muqbil stated, it is a dead da?wah ? they do not call to tawheed, do not warn against shirk, and do not forbid the evil. Thus, it is expected that many people would embrace such a hollow call.]

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree

PAGE: 1 2 3





SalafiPublications.Com
TawhidFirst | Aqidah | AboveTheThrone | Asharis
Madkhalis | Takfiris | Maturidis | Dajjaal
Islam Against Extremism | Manhaj
Ibn Taymiyyah | Bidah
Arabic Nouns and Adjectives


main page | contact us
Copyright 2001 - SalafiTalk.Net
Madinah Dates Gold Silver Investments