SalafiTalk.Net
SalafiTalk.Net » General Discussion
» The Tableeghee Encyclopedia: A Guide to the Heretical Sect of Shirk and Dalaal ? Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh
Search ===>




Part 1Part 2Part 3Part 4Part 5Part 6Part 7Part 8Part 9 • Part 10 • Part 11 • Part 12


 Moderated by Admin  Reply to this Discussion Start new discussion << previous || next >> 
Posted By Topic: The Tableeghee Encyclopedia: A Guide to the Heretical Sect of Shirk and Dalaal ? Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh -- page: 1 2 3

book mark this topic Printer-friendly Version  send this discussion to a friend  new posts first

sajid_chauhan_81
04-27-2009 @ 10:22 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 2031
Joined: Jul 2005
          
Another link on Salafitalk that has more fataawa and evidences for deviance of Tablighi Jamaat and the Deobandee Soofees

sajid_chauhan_81
03-10-2009 @ 11:34 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 2031
Joined: Jul 2005
          
The Arabic book of al-Allamah Dr. Taqiuddin al-Hilali rahimahullah which refuted the Tablighi Jamaat way back in 1399AH is scanned in pdf format on the Shaykh's website at http://www.alhilali.net/?c=3&p=1&f=2&a=ifd

InshAllaah it will be good if atleast some parts of the book are translated since even after 30 years many Muslims are still being misguided by the Tablighi Jamaat.

wasim.ahmed
08-23-2007 @ 11:28 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 221
Joined: Nov 2003
          




Shaykh Dr Abdullaah ibn Zayd al-Musallam hafidhahullaah , one of the foremost students of Imaam Ibn Othaymeen rahimahullaah reported in his sharh of Fadhlul Islaam by Shaykhul Islaam Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhaab rahimahullaah while mentioning about Imaam Ibn Abdul Wahhaab & his da'wah, the fruits of which we see in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia that Alhamdulillaah, thought there are over 100,000 Masaajid in the kingdom one will not observe Shirk in them nor have they been constructed on graves which is a common phenomenon in other countries.

He also mentioned about the deviation of Jamaa'at Ikhwaanul Muslimeen & Jamaa'atut Tableegh & their efforts in spreading their false manhaj here in the kingdom especially among the youth here.

He told that he personally asked Imaam Ibn Othaymeen whether he considered Jamaa'atut Tableegh among Ahlus Sunnah or Ahlul Bid'ah & he (ibn Othaymeen) told him that he conidered them to be from the Ahlul Bid'ah.

Shaykh Abdullaah's lectures can be downloaded from this website
www.cortoba-unaiza.com

BaarakAllaahu feekum,









  
  

ekbal.hussain
01-09-2005 @ 10:31 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: Dec 2002
          
A series of articles refuting and exposing the Shirk and Bid'ah found in the Books of the 'Tablighee sect':

http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/sp.cfm?secID=GRV&subsecID=GRV02&loadpage=displaysubsection.cfm

ekbal.hussain
12-04-2004 @ 10:27 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: Dec 2002
          
Raised!

abu.abdul.azeez
10-17-2004 @ 9:56 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan Refutes the Distorted Interpretations of Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh

Question: What is the meaning of the Statement of Allaah...

 Aali Imran (3):110

You [true believers in Islmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma'rf (i.e. Islmic Monotheism and all that Islm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islm has forbidden), and you believe in Allh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fsiqn (disobedient to Allh - and rebellious against Allh's Command).


...because some of those who established the principles of Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh interpreted this to mean that a person should go out on khurooj for four months in his lifetime?

Shaykh al-Fawzaan: This is distortion of the Qur?aan, an interpretation without a valid face to it. He didn?t say ?kharajat? (went out), he said ?ukhrijat lin-naas? (raised up for mankind). So Allaah raised [this nation] up. And it does not mean khurooj for four months or ten months, but it means that this nation has been distinguished from other nations in what Allaah has mentioned:

 Aali Imran (3):110

You [true believers in Islmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma'rf (i.e. Islmic Monotheism and all that Islm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islm has forbidden), and you believe in Allh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fsiqn (disobedient to Allh - and rebellious against Allh's Command).


And He did not say that you should go out to the people for four months or forty days ? all of this is from the distortion and misguidance of the people of innovations, and speaking about Allaah without knowledge, and interpreting the Speech of Allaah with other than its [correct] interpretation. And there is no might nor power except with Allaah. Yes.

Source:
http://www.sahab.net/sahab/showthread.php?threadid=307539

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 10-17-04 @ 10:00 AM

abu.abdul.azeez
05-30-2004 @ 10:21 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? Shaykh ?Abdul-Azeez Bin Baaz Rebukes Jamaa?at u-Tableegh For Their Abandoning the Da?wah to Tawheed

Question: May Allaah give you success. The caller, if he is in a land in which shirk is spread and [instead] occupies himself with rejecting the major sins, then is he rewarded for this?

Shaykh Bin Baaz: No. This person has no baseerah (knowledge with insight). He should occupy himself with rejecting shirk. Leaving aside the major sins does not benefit one if he remains upon shirk. But one should also occupy himself with clarifying tawheed and its proofs and clarifying the various types of shirk, such that he might be saved from shirk. So if he is saved from shirk, then he has been saved from a great evil. As for the major sins, then they are under the will[1]. So he should strive to clarify the proofs of tawheed and the proofs of shirk so that he might accept this from him, and so that Allaah will remove him from kufr and enter him into Islaam.

Question: O Shaykh, may Allaah give you peace. [What is the ruling on] he who goes out to call to Allaah and says: ?Let us not call to tawheed ul-uloohiyyah because it creates division?"

Shaykh Bin Baaz: No. This is incorrect. This is the way of Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh from India and Pakistan. Their ignorance is wrong.  The foundation is the call to tawheed if he is calling disbelievers[2]. But if he is calling Muslims, it is known that he should call them to salaah and the virtuous actions, and to the abandonment of sins. But if he is calling disbelievers, then it is necessary that he calls them to the tawheed of Allaah first, similar to what the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) said to Mu?aadh: ?Call them testify that there is none worthy of worship but Allaah...?

Source: Sharh Fath ul-Majeed (Tape 4A) by way of the following thread on sahab:
http://www.sahab.net/sahab/showthread.php?threadid=306187

--------------------
[1] This means that if Allaah wills, he can forgive the muwahhid?s major sins, and if He wills, he can punish him for these sins. As for the mushrik, then the one who dies upon it will not be forgiven and will remain in the fire eternally.
[2] This includes both disbelievers who claim Islaam, such as the Qubooriyyeen, Qadariyyah, Jahmiyyah, and extreme Rawaafidh, as well as those who do not, like the People of the Book.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 5-31-04 @ 5:03 PM

abu.abdul.azeez
04-21-2004 @ 3:19 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? Shaykh Saalih al-Atram ? Member of the Council of Senior Scholars ? Explains the Corrupt, Hollow Da?wah of the Tableegh

The Shaykh was asked about Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh, so he responded: ...And they call to Allaah by abandoning what Allaah has made obligatory upon them with regards to their children or parents. And they call to Allaah by traveling such that they can soften the hearts [of people] without giving them any ahkaam in fear of losing them.

Yet the [correct] da?wah to Allaah includes informing mankind of what Allaah has made obligatory upon them and warning them against that which Allaah has forbade them, just as we demonstrated in our initial speech; that the legislation of Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) consists of commanding [the good] and forbidding [the evil].

And if not, then the commanding [of the good] of Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) would only be an empty, meaningless conveyance of orders. Also, in spite of this, it (the correct da'wah) does not completely consist of orders such as the Salaah. Nevertheless, would [the Tableegh] come upon the worshipper of idols and those who seek assistance from the graves and tell them to abandon [these actions]? No, no, they would not say this ? [fearing that] they would alienate [those people and therefore lose them]. So where is this da?wah?

And they rigidly limit the da?wah to Allaah to graduated days and times ? three days, forty days, and three months. And at the end, what do they visit? A masjid containing the grave of a dead man ? this is their da?wah to Allaah!!!

The [correct] da?wah to Allaah between the Muslims [consists of] arousing them towards the Tawheed of Allaah and His worship, and guiding them away from falling into innovation and forbidden matters.

Source: The book "Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh" by way of the following thread on sahab:
http://www.sahab.net/sahab/showthread.php?postid=383141

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 4-21-04 @ 5:30 PM

abu.abdul.azeez
04-20-2004 @ 1:18 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? Shaykh Rabee' al-Madkhalee Responds to Those Who Attempt to Include the Tableegh Into Ahl us-Sunnah

While refuting ?Abdur-Rahmaan ?Abdul-Khaaliq, the Shaykh said: As for the third: Then it is his rejection of the inclusion of Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh and the hizb of Ikhwaan ul-Muslimeen alongside of the Mu?tazilah and Khawaarij and deeming them to be amongst the sects. And it is his rejection of those who state that these groups are neither upon the guidance of the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) , nor upon his Sunnah, nor upon his way and methodology.

So we ask: Is Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh founded upon that which the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) and his Companions were upon, just as the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) distinguished between the saved sect and the destroyed sects?

Does the Deobandee Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh keep the books of tawheed upon the manhaj of the Salaf us-Saalih in their schools, such as as-Sunnah of al-Laalikaa?ee, ash-Sharee?ah of al-Aajurree, al-Ibaanah of Ibn Battah, and al-Waasitiyyah, al-Hamawiyyah, at-Tadmuriyyah, and as-Sawaa?iq al-Mursalah?

And do they love these books and their people and advise the people to study them? Or do they wage war against these books and their people, and accuse them and their people of misguidance, and hold fast to the books of innovation, such as an-Nisfiyyah, and al-Masaayirah, and the books of ar-Raazee, and al-Eejee, and other than them from the books of ?aqeedah of the Maatureediyyah, Ashaa?irah, and Jahmiyyah?

And regarding tawheed ul-?ibaadah, do they hold fast to Kitaab ut-Tawheed and its explanations, and the book at-Tawassul wal-Waseelah, and ar-Radd ?Ala al-Bakree, and Ighaathat ul-Luhfaan, and what is similar to them?

Or do they wage war against these books and wage war against their people, and study the books of kalaam (i.e. rhetoric not based upon textual evidences), logic, and philosophy, and the books of tasawwuf based on shirk?! And do they love the people of hadeeth - the monotheists - because they are the people of tawheed who wage war against shirk and wage war against t?ateel (i.e. distortion of the Religion), [and do they love] Ahl us-Sunnah, those who adhere to the book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) ?! Or do they hate them and wage war against them?!

And lastly, they, alongside of all of these calamities, make oaths of adherence to four Soofee orders: the Naqshabandiyyah, the Sahrawardiyyah, the Jishtiyyah, and the Qaadiriyyah.

And they have [beliefs of] hulool (i.e. divine inter-dwelling), and wahdat ul-wujood, and the belief that the Awleeyaa? act independently in their existence. And their support is "Tableeghee Nisaab", and it is filled with misguided beliefs and fabricated ahaadeeth. And in addition to all of this, they are Murji?ah ? and these affairs have surpassed the level of regular occurrence (i.e. they are confirmed to be true and consistently-occurring).

And the statement that it is not permissible to include them with the innovated sects does not comply with the manhaj of the Salaf and does not comply with intelligence nor legislation, and [consists of] rejecting realities which are as clear as the sun. Then, in their fiqh, they are a people of opinions and bigotry who reject hundreds of authentic ahaadeeth in dozens of fiqh-related topics.

Indeed, Shaykh ul-Islaam [Ibn Taymiyyah] included the likes of those people amongst the Jahmiyyah with regards to their beliefs, for he said that the Ashaa?irah are amongst the Jahmiyyah except for those who embrace the book al-Ibaanah of Abee al-Hasan al-Ash?aree. So this is a clear case of their being included with the Jahmiyyah. And the Salaf used to declare as innovators whoever used to say ?...my recitation of the Qur?aan is created...? and used to declare as disbelievers whoever used to say that the Qur?aan is created...

Source: "Jamaa?ah Waahidah" by way of the following thread on sahab:
http://www.sahab.net/sahab/showthread.php?postid=383141

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 4-20-04 @ 1:37 AM

abu.abdul.azeez
04-18-2004 @ 7:06 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? 72 Years of Shirk and Dalaal: Shaykh Muhammad Taqee ud-Deen al-Hilaalee (d. 1408) Recounts His Experience With Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh

In his book ?ad-Da?wah ila-Allaah fee Aqtaar Mukhtalifah,? the Shaykh recounts his time in Afghanistan in the year 1352, where he once prayed the ?Asr as a traveler with a jamaa?ah from amongst the bigoted Ahnaaf (i.e. followers of the Hanafee madh-hab). When he performed the Sunnah of raising the two hands at its three proper stages of motion, this jamaa?ah then became agitated and began speaking in the Afghani language with the Imaam. So Shaykh Taqee ud-Deen said:

?Then [this jamaa?ah] spoke with the Imaam regarding their dispute with me... And this Imaam was from the Jamaa?ah of Mawlaa Illiyaas (i.e. Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh), and it is a well-known jamaa?ah in India. And they have something with them from tasawwuf (i.e. Soofee practices) ? the members of this jamaa?ah roam about every part of India, Europe, America, and Africa... And what I could gather about them is their strict adherence to the Hanafee opinions in the subsidiary matters, to the point that they do not teach authentic ahaadeeth if they contradict the Hanafee opinions in the subsidiary matters.

And there is something even more disgusting than this, and it is that they perform salaah in the masaajid which are built upon the graves that are taken as idols which are worshipped beside Allaah, and they do not reject their being worshipped...

And I do not prevent our companions from accompanying them and ordering them to reject shirk and innovation whenever they notice something like this according to their capabilities.?[1]

Source:
http://www.sahab.net/sahab/showthread.php?threadid=304115

--------------------
[1] As has been mentioned by several ?Ulamaa?, there is no longer any benefit to accompanying this Jamaa?ah and attempting to teach and correct them simply because they do not desire truth and have shown no inclination towards it at any stage in the 80+ years of their misguidance existence. Rather, as Shaykh al-Fawzaan stated, the Tableegh have not come to be taught, rather, they have come to teach their innovations and heretical beliefs. As for rejecting their shirk and innovations without accompanying them, then this is certainly binding upon all those who are able. And Allaah 'Azz wa Jal knows best.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 4-18-04 @ 8:28 AM

abu.abdul.azeez
01-20-2004 @ 6:05 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan Refutes a Common Tableeghee Doubt Regarding the Da?wah to Tawheed (with Sound)

Questioner: O Honorable Shaykh, may Allaah give you success, and this questioner states: One of the callers of Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh says: ?We have caused the people to be lost in the name of tawheed and have encouraged them upon sinning. And this is due to the statement that the muwahhid will enter Paradise regardless of his sins other than shirk. Tawheed, tawheed, and tawheed. So how will we respond to Allaah regarding the existence of these sinners?? So the question is: What is your Excellency?s opinion of this statement?

Shaykh al-Fawzaan: This is the statement of an ignoramus or a misguided one. Either he is an ignoramus and does not know the speech regarding the issues of knowledge, or he knows yet is misguided and desires misguidance of the people.

So there is no doubt that shirk is the greatest of the sins, and that its committer will not enter Paradise ? period. And as for the committer of sins, even if they be major and not shirk, then forgiveness and entrance to Paradise will return to him. And this is something which is not from us (i.e. invented by us). Allaah Jal wa ?Alaa says:

 An-Nisa (4):48

Verily, Allh forgives not that partners should be set up with him in worship, but He forgives except that (anything else) to whom He pleases, and whoever sets up partners with Allh in worship, he has indeed invented a tremendous sin.


And in the hadeeth [the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) said that Allaah will say]: ?Remove from the Fire whosoever has in his heart eemaan equivalent to the weight of a mustard seed.?[1] So tawheed guarantees for its possessor Paradise, either in the beginning or in the end, even if he is punished (in Hell). As for the mushrik, then there is no security for him ever. [Allaah says:]

 Al-An'am (6):82

It is those who believe (in the Oneness of Allh and worship none but Him Alone) and confuse not their belief with Zulm (wrong i.e. by worshipping others besides Allh), for them (only) there is security and they are the guided.


So the people of tawheed have security, those who do not cover their eemaan (faith) with dhulm (oppression) ? meaning shirk[2] ? have security, either completely, or in the end. As for the mushrik, then he has no security ? period ? and he is eternally in the Fire.

So this one who says that tawheed caused the people to be lost, then this, and the refuge is with Allaah, is atrocious speech. This is atrocious speech, false speech. Tawheed is what rectified the people, and it is what will save the people on the Day of Resurrection from the Fire. So it is the basis, and it is the foundation. And there is no comparison between the [ordinary] sin and shirk ? shirk is the greatest of sins, and there is no salvation alongside of it. As for the sins, then they are under the will [of Allaah] ? if Allaah wills, he can punish their committer, and if He wills, He can forgive him. And if he is punished, then his final outcome will [eventually] be Paradise. Yes.

--------------------
[1] Narrated by Abee Sa?eed and reported by al-Bukhaaree and others.
[2] The Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) himself explained that the oppression referred to in this verse is shirk.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 1-20-04 @ 8:42 PM


Attached FileFawzaan_08.zip (299 Kbytes)

abu.abdul.azeez
12-25-2003 @ 7:52 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? The Religion is Advice: An Essay on Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh by Shaykh Faalih Bin Naafi? al-Harbee ? English Translation ? Part VIII

24. Since the establishment of Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh in the Kingdom until today, previous opposition has risen against them from the ?Ulamaa?, Shaykhs, and students of knowledge, amongst whom are the Permanent Committee of Scientific Research, Legal Verdicts, Da?wah, and Counsel ? we will mention this shortly. And indeed, Shaykh Sa?d Bin ?Abdur-Rahmaan al-Husayyin pointed this out in his refutation of In?aam al-Hasan, the current head of the jamaa?ah. And two scientific research papers of criticism of the jamaa?ah were presented at the Islaamic University in al-Madeenah an-Nabawiyyah, and we will refer to them in what follows, in shaa? Allaah.

25. All or most of what we have mentioned in terms of the ideologies, methodologies, beliefs and other than that of those mutasawwifah (i.e. those who practice Soofiyyah) is known by the commoners, ignoramuses, and their likes from our lands who were affected by them. And they do not perceive their corruption, and they become enthusiastic in calling to them, believing the picture that they painted for them ? that they are callers to guidance, and that what they perform in terms of da?wah to Allaah, according to their allegations regarding them, is not performed by the Shaykhs, the people of the rotating chairs (i.e. holding important positions), and those who are Sultans ? that is what they say to them. And these [commoners] are not capable of performing da?wah except upon their way (the Tableeghee way), because they and those similar to them are ignoramuses. There have no criterion with them [to distinguish between truth and falsehood] and are not capable of anything except what they have learned from them and what they trained them to do. And they are currently fulfilling the role of the Tableeghee da?wah in these lands. And they have a secret, perfected, and precise order of operations upon which they trained them. And they have great propagation throughout various cities, nay, even villages and desert communities. And they have heads in every area from the areas of the Kingdom ? they move according to the orders of Sa?eed Ahmad, who is present in al-Madeenah an-Nabawiyyah, and according to guidelines from the general leader In?aam al-Hasan, who is present in India.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 12-25-03 @ 7:56 AM

abu.abdul.azeez
12-23-2003 @ 10:45 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan Exposes a Lie Against Him and Clarifies His Stance Towards Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh (with Sound)

Questioner: O Honorable Shaykh, may Allaah give you success. One of the leaders of Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh mentioned that you did indeed praise Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh in one of your previous lectures in the city of Qurayyah[1]. So is this true?

Shaykh al-Fawzaan: He is a liar. He is a jovial liar. Yes. I do not praise them, and I do not like them. Yes.

--------------------
[1] Allaahu A'lam, it is a relatively small city in the north-western part of Saudi Arabia, near the border with Jordan.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 12-23-03 @ 10:53 AM


Attached FileFawzaan_07.zip (52 Kbytes)

irshadmuhammed
12-19-2003 @ 3:27 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Sep 2002
          
wa'laikum salaam warahmatullahi wabrakatuh.


Akhi, all the lectures in the tread are in English Language.


Irshad Muhammed as-Saylanee

This message was edited by irshadmuhammed on 12-19-03 @ 9:54 AM

Daud.Chest
12-17-2003 @ 7:18 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 126
Joined: Apr 2003
          
Asalaamu Ailaykum,

My bad Akhi.  I forgot to put the link to the lectures.

http://www.twtpubs.com/audio/series/jamat_tableegh.php

I don't know if they're in english or not.

Daud Abdullaah

abu.abdul.azeez
12-17-2003 @ 5:42 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
وعليكم السلام

Can you please be more specific? Which lectures are you referring to?

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 12-17-03 @ 8:17 AM

Daud.Chest
12-16-2003 @ 8:32 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 126
Joined: Apr 2003
          
Asalaamu Ailaykum,

Are these lectures about the this hizb of shaytaan in english.  If not can someone translate them?

Barakallaahu Feekum,

Daud Abdullaah

abu.abdul.azeez
12-14-2003 @ 12:28 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? The Religion is Advice: An Essay on Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh by Shaykh Faalih Bin Naafi? al-Harbee ? English Translation ? Part VII

18. They closely surround them with authority figures and supervisors and instill fear in them, perhaps until they lose their mind or are on the verge of losing their mind.

19. They show bigotry to the Hanafee madh-hab with an abominable, blind sort of bigotry, such that they do not accept the texts and proofs from the Book and Sunnah if they differ with the madh-hab.

20. They believe in the misguidance and lack of eemaan of everyone who fails to enter the da?wah of the Tableegh, and that all of the Muslims are the object of their da?wah ? exactly like the Kuffaar.

21. Some of the people only notice their effect on the sinners, but the reality is that they have an effect on the upright people as well but in a greater way ? especially in our lands, for they removed them from the upright manhaj of the Salaf and assigned them to the fruitless manhaj of the Tableegh, which is founded upon innovation and misguidance.

22. Some of the people imagine that they are [only] slight ignoramuses and that they do not create evils for anyone. And the truth and reality is that they are callers who, in the foundations of their heretically-superstitious da?wah, deliberately hold tightly to these foundations without looking to the legislative proofs and knowledge. And what opposes them is discarded by the jamaa?ah [only] because it is in opposition to these fundamentals. And they have a severe principle, and it is that the end goal justifies the means[1]. So they believe in the permissibility of arriving to their goals even by committing acts which oppose the shar? (legislation), such as lying, forgery, and false promises. So they dislike that they should promise to change what they are upon and what is in their books in terms of tasawwuf, misguidance, lying, and other than that from that which does not agree with the Religion, and they do not keep their promises.

And whatever a person possesses from characteristics
Even if he imagines that they are hidden from the people, they are known

23. They say that the people, except for the Tableegh, are being put to trail: the rulers are put to trail by their leadership, the businessmen are put to trail by their business, the employees are put to trail by their jobs, and so on. And [they claim that] the Scholars have not benefited from their knowledge, have remained at ease, and have abandoned da?wah and khurooj, thus they are being put to trail. And they say to whoever follows them amongst the ignoramuses and their likes: ?As for you, then Allaah has protected you from the trials and has granted you eemaan, and with your little knowledge, you have sacrificed the worldly-life and have abandoned it and its people, and have performed khurooj in the path of Allaah. And thus, you all have an effect on the people because your speech, which comes from the heart, enters into the heart.?[2]

--------------------
[1] [This ?principle of kufr? ? as named by Imaam al-Albaanee ? is attributed to the Italian Nicolo Machiavelli (d. 1527 C.E.) and it is the fundamental operating principle for many secret societies and heretical cults, such as the Freemasons, Illuminati, and their various derivatives. The misguided innovators of this Ummah also base their activities on this principle, with the prime example being the Ikhwaan and their seedlings, such as the Qutubiyyah and Surooriyyah, all of whom are structurally and operationally similar to the aforementioned secret societies. May Allaah sever them all.]
[2] [And the Tableegh claim that, while Ahl us-Sunnah might speak with knowledge in their da'wah, they speak with the ?heart?, and that this is why so many people embrace their da?wah. And the reality is, people embrace their da?wah because, like Shaykh Muqbil stated, it is a dead da?wah ? they do not call to tawheed, do not warn against shirk, and do not forbid the evil. Thus, it is expected that many people would embrace such a hollow call.]

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree

abu.abdul.azeez
12-12-2003 @ 1:22 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? The Religion is Advice: An Essay on Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh by Shaykh Faalih Bin Naafi? al-Harbee ? English Translation ? Part VI

14. They do not forbid the evil ? ever ? and they openly admit that. And they do not enjoin the good in the correct manner, and they believe that the forbiddance of evil repels the Muslims and divides them, and that it is not from the wisdom in calling to Allaah.

15. They teach their followers many corrupt things from their ?aqeedah, amongst which are: that at-tawakkul (trust in Allaah) is not completed except by abandoning al-asbaab (the means by which things come about) by claiming that they have no effect, and that performing al-asbaab damages the validity of at-tawakkul[1]. And with this they affected many people, such that they abandoned their governmental jobs and their business-related activities. And they affected the youth, such that they abandoned their knowledge-based studies with the claim of at-tawakkul, and that, for whoever goes out in this da?wah and practiced its manhaj, everything will suffice for him and his provision will come from places which he perceives not, even if he doesn?t do any work. And the affair does not stop at this level, rather, they have been able to affect the young children, such that they removed them from their schools and classrooms and away from their fathers, mothers, and families, and they performed khurooj with them upon their way.

And what results from this in terms of waste, misguidance, corruption, and what results from the khurooj of those youths in terms of corruptions and perils is known, [yet] only Allaah knows their extent.

16. They fill the minds of their followers with stories which are all lies. And all of the miracles which they claim and all of the khuraafaat (superstitions) which they spin up and attribute to Islaam are false and slanderous. And they support their claims with weak and fabricated ahaadeeth, and the goal of this is sticking to and associating with the da?wah and its Shaykhs and leaders as well as their distinguishing between everything with which they associate.[2]

17. In Asmaa? and Sifaat (the Names and Attributes of Allaah 'Azz wa Jal), they teach them the beliefs of the Maatureediyyah and Ashaa?irah, and they reject the fact that tawheed ul-?ibaadah (the tawheed of worship) is the meaning of Laa Ilaaha ila-Allaah.

--------------------
[1] [And this is a heinous lie upon Allaah ?Azz wa Jal, for the belief in al-asbaab is from the ?aqeedah of Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa?ah. Refer to this article. Aside from what is mentioned by Shaykh ul-Islaam and Ibn Sa?dee in the aforementioned article, Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan also refuted the falsehood of such innovators by mentioning how the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) used to prepare strategies, wear armor, and wield a scimitar when preparing for and fighting in various battles ? yet, despite his performing these asbaab, he was still the most trusting in Allaah of all mankind.]
[2] [That is, their intent in spreading these stories and superstitions is causing their followers and potential recruits to be even more attracted and participant in their activities. As such, some of their stories are meant to scare unsuspecting people into joining them, whereas others are meant to make the Tableegh appear ?miraculous? and ?blessed?, thus fooling the foolish into going khurooj with them. And these are all shameless tactics used by those who lack any textual evidence for their forged manaahij ? in fact, these tactics are common with Christian missionaries, who regularly resort to story-telling, narrations of false miracles, and other khuraafaat to gain converts.]

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 12-12-03 @ 4:16 AM

abu.abdul.azeez
12-09-2003 @ 7:27 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Feb 2003
          
NEW! ? The Religion is Advice: An Essay on Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh by Shaykh Faalih Bin Naafi? al-Harbee ? English Translation ? Part V

10. They send out whoever ascribes to the jamaa?ah, [stating] that he is pious caller, and that he is doing what the ?Ulamaa? [of Ahl us-Sunnah] are not doing, even if he is amongst the most ignorant of the ignoramuses. And there is found in their hearts a hatred towards the ?Ulamaa? and a love for the Shaykhs of the Tableegh, and they warn against listening to anyone but them. Nonetheless, it is befitting that we know that the terminology of the Tableegh in granting the name ?Shaykh? or ?Mashaayikh? differs from our terminology: so the well-experienced caller who went to India and Pakistan, conducted various travels (i.e. khurooj for the specified periods of time), practiced the entire manhaj in da?wah of the Tableegh and was loyal to it, and so on, then he is the Shaykh according to them, even if he is amongst the most ignorant of the ignoramuses. And the reference points are the Indian Shaykhs who are upon this manhaj.

11. Their hatred of the people of ?aqeedah and the Imaams of the Salafee da?wah, and their complete hatred of Shaykh Muhammad Bin ?Abdil-Wahhaab, may Allaah have mercy on him, and his followers who carried the da?wah. So they accuse them of ignorance and stupidity, and that they are Khawaarij, and that they make takfeer of the Muslims, as is written in Kitaab ush-Shihaab uth-Thaaqib by Husayn Ahmad, one of the major Imaams of the jamaa?ah (p. 42). So he said: ?Know that Muhammad Bin ?Abdil-Wahhaab made his affair apparent in the beginning 13th century, and that he had corrupt beliefs bogus opinions. As such, he killed and fought against Ahl us-Sunnah and forced them to speak ill of his ?aqeedah and opinions, and he used to make lawful the pillaging of their wealth, and he thought that, in killing them, there was reward and recompense ? especially the people of Hijaaz, for indeed, he harmed them in the most severe way. And he used to insult the Salaf us-Saalih and speak about their status in the most evil manner, and many of them were called to account by his hand. In conclusion, he is a tyrannical oppressor and sinning murderer, thus, the Arabs hated him more severely than the Jews and Christians??

And Anwar Shaah al-Kashmeeree, also one of their Imaams, said in Faydh ul-Baaree (1/170): ?As for Muhammad Bin Abdil-Wahhaab an-Najdee, then he was a stupid man with little knowledge, so he used to hurry to pass judgments of kufr. And it is not befitting [for anyone] to dive into this valley (i.e. takfeer), except for he who is precise and knowledgeable of kufr and its causes.?

As such, the Jamaa?at ut-Tableegh believe that the way of the Salaf in passing judgments of shirk upon the mushrikeen, innovation upon the innovators, and so on is harsh and severe, and that it is a fruitless way, and that it is not from the wisdom in da?wah. And the da?wah of the Tableegh prevents differentiation between the muwahhid (monotheist) and the mushrik (polytheist), innovator, and sinner. So the manhaj according to them is leaving the people upon what they believe, since the important issue according to them is carrying out the rituals and the specific principles upon which their da?wah is based.

13. Their allegation that tawheed and ahkaam are causes of dissension, and that teaching them and calling to them divides the Muslims and repels them from the da?wah, and that it is not from the wisdom in calling to Allaah. And this is nothing but scattering ashes into the eyes, such that their enmity towards the manhaj of the Salaf followed in our lands is not exposed.

------------------------------------------
Abu 'Abdil-'Azeez al-Misree


This message was edited by abu.abdul.azeez on 12-9-03 @ 7:33 PM

PAGE: 1 2 3





SalafiPublications.Com
TawhidFirst | Aqidah | AboveTheThrone | Asharis
Madkhalis | Takfiris | Maturidis | Dajjaal
Islam Against Extremism | Manhaj
Ibn Taymiyyah | Bidah
Best Way to Learn Arabic Language


main page | contact us
Copyright 2001 - SalafiTalk.Net
Madinah Dates Gold Silver Investments