Topic: Who cares what these Websites think about Suhaib Hasan now!??


spubs.com    -- 01-28-2011 @ 7:13 PM
 



Who cares what these Websites think about Suhaib Hasan now!?? After years of protecting him upon falsehood, they decide to drop this volatile and explosive hot potato!


Now emails (from FatwaOnline) have begun to appear calling for Suhaib Hasan to be boycotted... Hold on one minute!

They (and others like them) have been defending him upon falsehood for near on two decades - even when he fought against the Fatawa of the major scholars such as Ibn Baz, Al-Albaanee and Ibn Uthaimeen (rahimahumullaah) - they used to proclaim, "he is an aalim in his own right, he has a right to differ with anyone he wishes because he is a mujtahid" - and that is even when he differed with the ijmaa' of Ahlus-Sunnah, they excused him - he was their aalim, he was untouchable, even though Shaikh Muqbil refuted him, Shaikh Ubaid refuted him, Shaikh Muhammad bin Haadee refuted him, Shaikh al-Anjaree refuted him, Shaikh Falaah Ismaa'eel refuted him - and his allies at Green Lane and at Ihyaa Turaath were also refuted.

He went to celebrate the Milad of the Prophet with Soofees and the politicians, you excused him; He defended and praised the innovators such as Hamza Yusuf and Sa'eed Darsh - you still excused him. He misled the Ummah, you still excused him. You even lied to the Scholars to defend your beloved Shaikh Suhaib and Green Lane! You advised people to attend conferences where he was present and mailed the dunyah in his defence. You attacked those who refuted your beloved Shaikh and his allies at Green Lane!

But you justified all of this due to your love of these people, a love that went beyond the limits permitted in the sharee'ah - and due to your hatred of those who opposed Suhaib Hasan and his allies at Green Lane and Ihyaa Turaath, a hatred that went beyond the limits of the Sharee'ah.

And these websites did this after the Scholars had refuted Suhaib Hasan over ten years ago with detailed proofs that are available till this day; But now these former defenders and fence-sitters wish to be seen as the vanguards of ahlus-Sunnah because he has defended his own son upon kufr? KUFR!! So it took an issue to reach the level of kufr before you spoke!? And you regard yourself to be students of knowledge? This is pure treachery. So anything short of that was acceptable to you - praising the heads of sufism was acceptable? Cooperating and sharing platforms with them was acceptable? Showing love and affection to the innovators was acceptable?

So do not be deceived O Salafi by the political machinations of these individuals. In a few weeks they will return to advertising events organised by Ihyaa Turaath, and Green Lane (Abu Usamah Dhahabi etc.) and the followers of al-Maghraawee, Al-Ma'rabi and Ali Hasan, and others from the people of hizbiyyah or who have been afflicted with something from hizbiyyah. And they will not refute them so long as they don't reach the level of kufr we assume? That seems to be the limit of their walaa' and baraa' - bid'ah and hizbiyyah is acceptable, but they'll draw a line at Major Shirk and Kufr! The  way of the Salafi is to oppose and refute sins, bid'ah, kufr, shirk and nifaaq! And to call people to the truth of the Kitaab and Sunnah upon the way of the Salaf.

You may have dropped Suhaib Hasan as an individual, and before him Yasir Qadhi as an individual, but you have not abandoned their ikhwaani principle of excusing and cooperating with ahlul-bid'ah and the hizbiyyeen which led them to their grave mistakes in the first place. That's the problem! And that is what leads you to your continued defense of the people of hizbiyyah.

Sorry but your treachery is not accepted. Upon you is tawbah and an apology to the Salafis for your defence of the likes of Suhaib Hasan and his allies! For years this man has been refuting the Salafis and you remained silent - rather you promoted events where he was attending and delivering lectures and duroos! Shame on you!


_____________________________
[url=http://www.salaf.com/][/url]


Abu.Dawood.Abdullaah    -- 01-28-2011 @ 11:53 PM
  Assalamu Alaykum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakaatahu

The Mujaddid of Yemen in this era, Shaykh Muqbil warned against Suhaib Hasan more than 10 years ago but partisanship, nationalism or worldly benefit prevented these same individuals from accepting this criticism.

This Manhaj is corrupt! No principles, no guidelines and no direction.

Suhaib Hasan has been condoning falsehood for years.

Don't forget his appraisal of Hamzah Yusef and his translation of Tahawiyyah. Him sharing the platform with people who promote clear Shirk without saying a word. Attending the Mawlid an-Nabiyy; and the list could go on.

So why now are they warning against him? Are they afraid that the scholars will be informed, their funding will cease or their true state will be impossible to hide?

Ya Fatwa Online, respect yourself and others!

Brothers and sisters, the world can now see who the blindfollowers really are.

Alhamdu lillah, when the Muhaddith Muqbil Ibn Haadee spoke the people of Sunnah accepted his advice and left Suhaib and Abu 'Aaliyyah. The Da'wah spread and flourished until Fatwaonline's sister websites elevated Suhaib and those like him.

May Allah allow us to recognize the truth and follow it; and recognize falsehood as falsehood and stay away from it.


msaqib2    -- 02-01-2011 @ 4:02 PM
 
By Shaykh al-'Allaamah Aboo 'Abdur-Rahmaan Muqbil Ibn Haadee al-Waadi'ee Rahimahullah (d.1421H)


Click Here to read the words of the Shaykh (translated)...

http://www.troid.org/media/pdf/suhaybhasan.pdf

Audio also available [search youtube]


Its a shame that some brothers decided not to listen to the Shaykh back then.

Highlights are on pages 7 and 8.



Info:
A just refutation against the one known as Suhayb Hasan.
The Noble Shaykh exposes the obscene ignorance of this one whose insanity has caused him to consider himself a contemporary of Imaam Rabee'us-Sunnah al-Madkhalee.
He has also spoken in favour of the existence of multiple parties, thus opposing the fundamental principle of unity practiced by Ahlus-Sunnah.
Perhaps his greatest contention with the Salafee manhaj lies in his claim that the science of al-Jarh wat-Ta'deel no longer exists in our time (thus eliminating the praise and disparagement of men and specifying it to the authentication of narrations only).


SalafiTalk.Net : http://www.salafitalk.net/st
Topic: http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=12079