AbooTasneem | -- 26-02-2003 @ 12:00 AM | ||||
I would like to know if this organization (that calls themselves a 'movement') has anything to do with salafiyyah? Please provide detailed information (if possible) concerning them. Baarakallaahu feekum! The organization's name is commonly known as K.N.M. or Kerala Nadvathul Mujahideen. كن مستفيدا أو مفيدا أو اسكت بحلم This message was edited by AbooTasneem on 2-26-03 @ 9:44 PM
|
|||||
abdul.azeem | -- 22-09-2005 @ 3:45 PM | ||||
Bismillah Al-Hamdulillah As-Salatu Wa-Assalaamu Alaa-Rasoolillah.
Assalaamuaalaikum Wa Rahmathullahi Wa Barakathuhu! Brother Zubair Muhammad from Kerala has transcribed the fatwa of Shaikh, al-Allamah Obaid Ibn Abdullah al-Jaabiree (hafidhahullah). Can any of the brothers volunteer to translate into English language for the benefit of the Indians? Our da?wah and our ?aqeedah is more beloved to us than our own selves, our wealth and our offspring. So we are not prepared to part with it for gold, nor silver. We say this so that no one may have hope in buying out our da?wah, nor should he think that it is possible for him to purchase it from us for deenaar or dirham. Since the politicians already know this about us, so they have despaired of buying it from us with granted positions or wealth..Shaikh, the Allamah, Muqbil ibn Hadee Al Waa'di'ee (Rahimahullah).
|
|||||
wasim.ahmed | -- 08-11-2005 @ 1:15 PM | ||||
Bismillaah wassalaatu wassalaam 'ala rasulillaah. Assalaamu 'alaikum wa rahamtullaahi wa barakaatuhu, Alhamdulillaah,our Brother Abu Talal Zubair ibn Muhammad from Kerala has translated the Fatwa of Shaykh 'Ubayd al Jaabiree (hafidhahullaah).
BaarakAllaahu feekum, wassalaamu 'alaikum wa rahmatullaah , 'Abdurraheem Alhindee This message was edited by wasim.ahmed on 6-17-06 @ 3:57 PM
|
|||||
abdul.azeem | -- 16-02-2006 @ 12:10 PM | ||||
Bismillah Al-Hamdulillah As-Salatu Wa-Assalaamu Alaa-Rasoolillah. If you read the transcript carefully it is evident that the following words from Shaykh hafidhahullah are referring to the group in which there is grave worshipping and not the KNM. It is incorrect to attribute this to KNM. And I ask the brother to correct the post above. And can any of the brothers cross check the translation. I understand that this should have been done first before this came out but I hope that words are not attributed incorrectly to the Mashaikh now and in future Insha Allah. It has no portion (from the Sunnah) except the nomenclature. Moreover as became clear to me from the question ,it (KNM) is established on Shirk and Bid'ah there is no Sunnah in it, except for a little. However, it has became clear to me from the question about it, that if there is some Sunnah in it, its a very meagre amount. I seek forgiveness from Allah and [THEN] from KNM for this error that went unchecked for couple of months and may Allah forgive us for our shortcomings.. Our da?wah and our ?aqeedah is more beloved to us than our own selves, our wealth and our offspring. So we are not prepared to part with it for gold, nor silver. We say this so that no one may have hope in buying out our da?wah, nor should he think that it is possible for him to purchase it from us for deenaar or dirham. Since the politicians already know this about us, so they have despaired of buying it from us with granted positions or wealth..Shaikh, the Allamah, Muqbil ibn Hadee Al Waa'di'ee (Rahimahullah).
|
|||||
abu.hurairah.shabeer | -- 19-12-2006 @ 12:20 PM | ||||
Reply of Shaykhana Rabee ibn Hadee Umayr al Madhkalee hafidhahullah to the lie.. Bismillah, SubhanAllaah, Hizbiyyah is a disease, from amongst the worst of diseases which makes a person spread lies, makes one shameless in spreading lies upon scholars, transgressing rights of scholars and brothers, attacking their honour and even cause threat to their lives & wealth. Allaah Musta'an. One game plan which the hizbees indulged in when the statement of Shaykhul Allaamah Ubaid ibn Abdillah al Jaabiree hafidhahullah on KNM came was to downplay it, also discredit the Shaykh, subhanAllah, some senior leaders amongst KNM worked on a different gameplan to spread a lie amongst the youngsters who went to enquire about the statement of Shaykhul Allaamah Ubaid Al Jabiree hafidhahullah that Shaykh Rabee hafidhahullah has given 'tazkiyah' to KNM. I asked our brother Abu Thaimiyah Haneef al Athari, the student of Shaykh Muhammed al Anjaree hafidhahullah & Shaykh Falaah al Ismaeel hafidhahullah about this issue. So akhee Haneef al Athari told me that during their conversation with Shaykhana Rabee hafidhahullah, Shaykh enquired about the developments of salafiyah in kerala and while answering, akhee Haneef al Athari told Shaykhana that KNM is spreading that Shaykh has given tazkiyah to them, to which Shaykhana Rabee hafidhahullah replied that how can he give tazkiyah to their bidah and said to akhee Haneef-"CONVEY TOTHEM FROM ME,THAT I AM FREE FROM THEM"*.End of Quote.(also present during this conversation with akheena Haneef al Athari where akhee Abu Hisham Shereef & Akhee abu Hatim Bushair) Allaahu Akbar. *this is the same reply which Abdullah ibn Umar radhiAllaahuanhu gave when the fitnah of Qadariyah was mentioned to him (Saheeh Muslim). May peace and prayers be upon the prophet his family and companions. "Oh Allah, I seek refuge in You lest I misguide others, or I am misguided by others, lest I cause others to err or I am caused to err, lest I abuse others or be abused, and lest I behave foolishly or meet with the foolishness of others". (Abu-Dawud, Ibn Majah, Nasa'i, At-Termithi see also Al-Albani, Sahih At-Tirmithi 3/152 and Sahih Ibn Majah 2/336) "Oh Allah, I seek refuge in You lest I misguide others, or I am misguided by others, lest I cause others to err or I am caused to err, lest I abuse others or be abused, and lest I behave foolishly or meet with the foolishness of others". (Abu-Dawud, Ibn
|
|||||
abu.hurairah.shabeer | -- 19-12-2006 @ 12:29 PM | ||||
Islaahiyah- A cult under the guise of Salafiyah. KNM E x p o s e d!!! ________________________________________________________________ Al Madrasatul Islaahiyah:- EGYPT : Egypt is the cradle/ birthplace of this sect called Islaahis. With the conquest of Egypt by Napolean the islaamic identity and symbols were replaced by secular ideas and institutions.As a reaction to this Anti religious and irreligious secular institutions under the pretext to reform & repair the socio- political fabric the Islaahi movement rose its head, This was more of an intellectual and ideological movement. Hakeemeyah is the militant - revolutionary manifestation of this ideological islaahi movement .its off shoots are many- the Ikhawaani, Qutubi, Suroori movements and their likes through out globe. This Hakeemeyah movements have bought disastrous implications in not only temporal arena but also in the area of islaamic beliefs/creed, methodology, practice and so much so that it even damaged and corrupted the terminology by coining new terms?Islaamic activism, Islaamic movement, islaamic work etc? Kerala Nadvatul Mujahid (KNM) - The Islaahis in India- a run-away faction from the ideological School of Islaahiyah of Egypt. In 1922 after fall of uthmaniyah khilafat the movements behind struggle to protect khilaafat were greatly taken back and in muslim minority places they began to take shape of organizations, perhaps as a result of the sense of deprivation, failure and misguided zeal to reinstate khilaafah under its pretext in India the Nadvatul Ulema Hind, in kerala - Kerala Jamiatul Ulema, which was again part of Muslim Aikya Vedi. KJU had a wholesale borrowing from the Islaahi movement in Egypt in all its aspect. It gave birth to the Kerala Nadvatul Mujahideen, whose structure & shape borrowed from the Haakimiya group who had colonial, jumooriyah structure, who inturn has borrowed it from the Freemasonic structure ( ref www.spubs.com articles on - Effects of methodologies of Ikhwaanul Muslimeen upon the path of salafiyah). Nomenclature of Deception: The Islaahis (KNM) continued to don the garb of salafiyah to deceive the masses and to help in raising funds abroad. But this salafiyah was just limited to the name. KJU, KNM only looked to the Egyptian intellectual movement, their ideology, methodology & their literature. So Jahmee, Asharee, Aqalaini Tafaseers, and other books were held in higest esteem and considered as only valid and acceptable material which went hand in hand with this newly invented hizbiyyah spirit and methodology. Thus Fi Zilal e Quran, Tafseer Manaar, Tafseer of Raazi which were rejected as tafseers of Ahle Sunnah wal Jama'ah,become the favourite and authoritative Tafseers which they learned and taught in their institutions . Magazines of Maududi, Rasheed Rida were subscribed , read , preserved , taught , religiously learnt and propogated. These gave fodder to these Islaahis to refute and reject the majority of masses engulfed in grave worship, evil customs & ignorance. This Aqalani methodology appealed to many of the western educated elite too to a certain extend. In the midst of all this Salafiyah gained momentum in Hijaz and Najd but this made little influnce on these Islaahis, who wore the garb of Salafiyah. Little effort were made to connect to Hijaaz except some individuals ( which remain true to this day, with the exception to usurp material gains). Some individuals in their personal level had some contact with Hijaaz but never was this used to correct & return to salafiyah. Neither these few individuals try to free this colonial structured hizbiyyah nor did the hizbis attempt to leave their Ashariyah, Aqlaniyah, Islaahiyah?etc and return to Salafiyah. The Egyptian connections continued to the extend that in the recent past "fatwas", books of the deviant wicked mufti "Yusuf al Qardawi" were held in high esteem & printed & distributed "officially". All aspect of Hizbiyyah were present avoiding the militant factor except stray incident of forming an outfit called ? "Volunteeer Core". Khawaarijul Ilm-us-Salaf : Due to Faulty Sourcing of knowledge from Islaahi hizbis & no contact with Ulema of Ahle Sunnah wal Jama'ah , their rulings and stand on important matters of deen were alarmingly disastrous. Due to ignorance of salafiyah & its sources & scholars gross error found placein writings and rulings. Due to Ashariyah, Islaahiyah, Aqlaaniyah, Hizbiyyah handed over by the early leaders salafi Aqeedah & Manhaj remained Alien topic, which if raised by individuals were looked upon with great contempt and were crushed ruthlessly under the guise of protecting their "infalliable" hizbiyyah Islaahi movement, which they have been successful in passing it as "Salafiyah" or "modern salafiyah" a term which can be found in their published works.Ashariyya was blindly accepted , adopted and favoured to the extend that Tawheed ul Asmaa wa Siffat was a taboo subject. Few example: 'At Tawheed' , the first book published by kerala nadvatul mujahideen doesn't even have the topic of Tawheed ul Asmaa wa siffat delt in any form. The present leader AP Abdul Qadir Moulvi's book 'Islaamika vishwaasam' (The Islaamic Creed) also doesn't have Tawheed ul Asmaa wa siffat explained or mentioned. The Masterpiece Tafseer produced by KNM "scholar" Amaani Moulvi, who clubbed various Tafseers ('Fee Zilaali Quraan' of Sayed Qutub too rank amongst the list of tafseers which the author subscribed to while compiling this 'masterpiece'. Remember to note:- ['al - Mawriduz - Zalaal fit - Tanbeej 'alaa Akhtaaiz - Zilaal' of the scholar Abdullah as-Duwaish - 1st Edition, 1408H. Daarul - 'Ulyaan, al-Qaseem, Buraidah], Shaikh Abdullah Duwaish lists 181 errors in Aqeedah and other matters in Fi Zilaal--- Allah knows how many of Fee Dhalaal's error crept into this Masterpiece Tafseer). In this master piece Tafseer, in the translation and explanation of Surah Qalam 68:42,which Speaks about Shin of Allah, This Attribute is denied and translated and explained as Shin of people in hereafter. (Eventhough Ibn Katheer, Tabari etc finds place in the foreword by author of this masterpiece tafseer as the Tafseers which he referred to). This mistake is also found in the Holy quran translation printed by King Fahd printing press and distributed by Kingdom of Saudi Arabia as their official translation , and the matter was bought to the notice of one of the translator ? Kunhi Muhammed Parapur, but he vehemently denied any such meaning given to that Ayah which indicate Shin of Allah. SubhanAllah this is height of Hizbiyyah, Takabbur and Taasub. (one of my friend reported to me that this co-translator Kunhi Muhammed Parapur raised his lower garment over his shin and asked that -do you mean Allah does like this, Allahu Musta'an) Islaahis also translated the book by Sayed Sulaiman Nadvi 'Ahle sunnah wal jamah' which allege imam Ahmed bin Hambal to be a mujassim, astaghfirullah.The Qutubi revolutionary Muhammed Al Ghazzalis book- "Allah" has also been translated. There has been series of grave errors in the matter of Asma wa Siffat, mainly of Tateel, Tahreef by their "comparitive dawah wing stalwarts"(InshAllah this will be dealt as different topic). Now read this : The view of Taqee-ud-deen Abu Muhammed Abdul Ghanee ibn Abdil Waahid Al Maqdisee, may Allah have mercy on him, concerning various groups. He said :"Know, May Allah have Mercy on you, that islaam and its adherents are undermined by three types of groups (1) The first type reject the Ahadeeth concerning Allah's Attributes and deem their narrators to be liars. These individuals are more harmful to islaam and its adherents than the disbelievers.(2) Another group believes them to be authentic and accepts them. However they distort their (true)meanings. These people are far more dangerious than first group. (3) The third type of group combines the first two views. So they move towards eliminating, according to their perception, any anthropomorphic qualities from Allah, but they are not truthful. These leads them to accept the first two views, and they are more dangerous than the first two groups" ( Aqeedatul Hafidh Abdul Ghanee pg.121. taken from the e-book from www.al-ibaanah.com - "The Methodology of Ahl us sunnah wal jamaah in warning against innovators and their books" page.3 . by Shaykh Rabee ibn Hadee Al Madhkhalee hafidhahullah. Free Thought Movement- Anarchist: This is a general situation inside the organisation and their literature. Each and every leader and person has got his own understanding and stand on issues related to deen, his own interpretations and rulings on crucial issues which is diagonally opposite to the Understanding of Salaf us saaliheen. And whenever an attempt is made to bring this notice to their topmost leaders , they pass the buck or say it as an "individual opinion" and a stray incident, since when did individual opinion find its way in Islam, that too of an organization which recently speaks and boast about their adherence to 'Fahm us Sahaba'. Whenever a KNM or KJU leader is cornered to declare the 'official stand' of the jamaat on issues their khaatibs pass on as bid'a (such matters are numerous) they shy away with excuses like he can't comment on the matter or without excuses. My experience with the self declared Ikhwaani, Qutubist leaders in India ( the Jamaat e islaami hind) is very much same as this after all both were born, nurtured, raised and indoctrinated in the same Kindergarten and School and University of Islaahiyah. Ignorance breeds Arrogance: Sacrificed Ittiba e Rasool in the altar of Aqlani, Modernist interpretation. Due to early mentioned pitfalls in Aqeedah, manhaj of this hizb, Following the Prophet salAllahu alaihiwasallam was looked down in practice ( not explicitly in speech, like all hizbis KNM too claimed following Kitaab wa sunnah). So now also you can see clean shaved, people who trail their lower garment below ankle and so on in their rank and file. Their magazines, souvenier, journals are filled with Photographs. The list of Sunnah which is crushed under this devilish movement which draw inspiration from the likes of Rafidee Masonic Jamaludeen afganee, Aqlaani, rejector of Ahadeeth ( Dr.Mustafa sibaaee mentions this in his thesis ? Al maqaana Sunnah fi sharee islaamiya?) is quiet exhaustive and inshAllah in future this will be dealt as a different topic. Important issues like - islaamic ruling on Music, islaamic ruling on Tasweer are belittled & mocked by even their top rung leaders, and whenever some of them is cornered with overwhelming proofs from kitab wa sunnah the biggest 'excuse' they give is - the organisation is busy with the topic of tawheed so no time could be devoted for topics lesser than that, subhanAllah. A lie to protect other lies. How did Salafis around the world from all place and time found time for matters of importance in deen, and what a calamity? the tawheed with which these miskeen of ilm were so busy completely left out Tawheed al Asma wa siffat resulting in disastrous implications in their beliefs,books and dawah. Comparative Religion: - Hallmark of -The Miskeen of Ilm: Umar radhiAllahu anhu was stopped from even looking into the scriptures of Jews by Rasool salAllahu alaihiwasallam, SubhanAllah then how grave is the sin of using the the books and scriptures of the people of book and other mushrikeen as a tool of dawah by those who don't even know the basics of deen and shariah. Their 'dawah wing' - Niche of Truth specializes in this innovative manhaj founded by the likes of Ahmed Deedat and Dr.Zakir Naik.( their publications advocate and promote the aqeedah of philosophers and deny the aqeedah of ahlu sunnah wal jama'ah on Asma wa siffat) Manhaj in Dawah laced with Itizaal, Ilhaad, Modernism--- Practicality,Aqlaaniyah, using Science as a tool of dawah (tapes of the Wahdatul Wujood advocate harun yahya is widely dubbed/translated by KNM dawah center Niche of Truth). Question: Is it permissible to examine and study the corrupt books of the disbelievers such as the Torah and the Gospel? Answer: We do not advise that this be done because the Prophet (sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam) said as is recorded in Saheeh Al-Bukhaaree from the narration of Abu Hurairah: "Do not believe the People of the Book nor disbelieve them, but say: 'We believ in Allaah and in what was revealed to us.'" And in the Musnad of Imaam Ahmad, from the report of Jaabir, the Prophet (sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam) said: "For perhaps you may (end up) either believing in something false or denying something true." And Allaah says in His Noble Book: "Do you think that they will believe in your Religion even though a party of them used to hear the Word of Allaah and then used to change it knowingly after having understood it?" [Surah Al-Baqarah: 75] Therefore, I do not advise this. However, it is permissible to do this for a scholar, well established in knowledge, who wants to takes these texts and refute them and expose their errors and contradictions. There is no harm in this. But he should be well versed in his Islamic Creed, on the subject of Allaah's Names and Attributes and on the Oneness of Allaah in His Worship (Uloohiyyah). His goal should not be to refute those individuals while he himself opposes the Creed of the Muslims. Shaikh Muqbil bin Haadee Al-Waadi'ee [Tuhfat-ul-Mujeeb: pg. 69-70] The Belittling of Ulema and the Ahl ul Ilm of Hijaaz : In my effort to persuade the office bearers of this hizbis to teach the Aqeedah and Manhaj of Salaf so that the masses know the inherent danger in the Hizbiyyah and its deviation in both Aqeedah and Manhaj of Salaf us Saliheen, i spoke to few of their leaders like AbduRahman "Salafi"- prominent amongst KNM top rank leaders, Haris ibn Saleem- the leader of the Youth wing ISM(he is the biggest jaahil i have met who beautify his speech with kalaam to belittle the sunnah) , their justification for not teaching masses the Aqeedah and Manhaj of salaf was that they have much better and serious things to do and the people and Saudis has got no other work since there is no presence of grave worship and other bidah and they (KNM) are practical in their approach as opposed to ulema in saudi who seclude themselves and are not aware of ground realities (this reminds one of the suroori-qutubi tool against ulema that they dont know the current affairs). SubhanAllah, did this juhaal ever thought how graveworship was wiped out of hijaaz. While pointing out to the leaders ( AbduRahman "salafi" and 'Director' of Niche of Truth MM Akbar since he praised Jamaludeen Afghanee and Mohammed Abdu as revivers in the Calicut town hall programme of their 2004 regional conference) about the Freemasonic relation of Jamaludeen Afghaanee and Mohammed Abdu, i quoted Imam Muqbil ibn Hadee al Wadiee rahimahullah. Hearing Imam Muqbil's name AbduRahman "salafi" ( i was addressing abduRahman 'salafi' as shaykh in our telephonic conversation) he said- "Muqbli? who is Muqbli? we dont know such a person" SubhanAllah. While talking to MM Akbar on the same issue, MM Akbar said " Muqbil is not known to us and people in kerala wont accept his statement", i tried to protest in vain that its the mistake of you and people of kerala that you dont know Shaykh Muqbil rahimahullah" The Scholars' Praise for Imam Muqbil bin Hadee al Wadiee rahimahullah, the Mujadid in lands of Yemen, the subduer of Innovation. The Muhaddith, the 'Allaamah, Muhammad Naasir-ud-Deen Al-Albaanee rahimahullah:In a cassette entitled "Abul-Hasan Al-Ma'ribee's Meeting with Al-Albaanee",7 the followingquestion was presented to the Shaikh: "Despite the stance that the two Shaikhs, Rabee' Ibn Haadee Al-Madkhalee and Muqbil Ibn Haadee Al-Waadi'ee, have taken in fighting against innovations and the deviant opinions and sayings, some of the youth have doubts as to if the two Shaikhs are upon the Salafee way." So the Shaikh, rahimahullaah, answered by saying: "Without a doubt, we praise Allaah, the Most High, for preparing for this upright Da'wah, which is based on the Qur'aan and the Sunnah according to the methodology of the Salaf As-Saalih, numerous callers throughout the various parts of the Muslim lands. They are the ones who take charge of the communal obligation (fard kifaa'ee), when there are very few who take this responsibility in the Muslim world today. So degrading and belittling these two Shaikhs (Rabee'and Muqbil), who call to the Qur'aan and the Sunnah and what the Salaf As-Saalih were upon and who wage war against those who oppose this correct methodology. As is quite clear to everyone, it either comes from one of two types of people. Either it comes from someone who is ignorant or someone who follows his desires... If he is ignorant, then he can be taught. But if he is one who follows his desires, then we seek Allaah's refuge from the evil of this person. And we ask Allaah,Mighty and Sublime, to either guide him or break his back." (taken from the online version of the book - 'The scholars praise for Shaikh Rabee ) [The Audio series Silsilah al-Hudaa wan-Noor: 1/851] Shaikh Muhammad bin Saalih Al-'Uthaimeen said: "Tell him that I consider him to be a mujaddid." Shaikh Yahyaa al-Hajooree reported that Shaikh Rabee' Al-Madkhalee said about him: "He is the mujaddid in the lands of Yemen" and that he said: "there can't be found from the time of 'Abdur-Razaaq as-San'aanee to this present day someone who established the Da'wah and revived it as the likes of Al-Waadi'ee." These quotes are from the book- Nubdhah Mukhtasarah of Shaikh Muqbil's daughter Umm 'Abdillaah (pg. 46} "Oh Allah, I seek refuge in You lest I misguide others, or I am misguided by others, lest I cause others to err or I am caused to err, lest I abuse others or be abused, and lest I behave foolishly or meet with the foolishness of others". (Abu-Dawud, Ibn
|
|||||
abu.hurairah.shabeer | -- 19-12-2006 @ 12:38 PM | ||||
What went wrong with KNM? 1. Distance from the Ulema rabbaniyeen.: We were not properly connected to the scholars during last 50 years. KM Moulavi and Umer Moulavi was having connections with them. But when the 'dawa work' got into full action they might have forgot to connect the next generation to the Ulema. So our umma do not know even the names of the Salafi scholars of this time.. this distance helped us to connect to the ulema jahl.. and kept us from realizing their problems.. also helped us from not rectifying the Ashariya and the shafiyah from us... so many of our people if we ask them where is Allah .. they will say .. everywhere .. or why should you ask that... or wherever he is what is our problem etc.... nasalullha alhidaya. 2. The language angle: Islahi's of kerala chose the translation option for tarbiya.. this was big fault as it was not the manhaj of salaf. They allowed to translate only for tasfiyah.. to teach the basics of aqeedah and till one accept that.. but tarbiyah they insisted to teach the language of Allah's kalam .. the language of salah.. the language of hadheeth. As side effect of this marriage with the translation option.. the khutbas became in malayalam.. which was never done in first five or ten generation.. the translations of quran became a norm.. the scholarldy khateebs were replaced by young malayalam orators who can't even read arabic well. And the last and most dangerous... shaytan became successful it totally cutting the ummah from the Ulema rabbaniyeen who speak or write only in Arabic. This also made us weak in the third part of Tawheed.. asma walssifat.. when it became difficult ot explain the Asma walssifat in Malayalam.. they opt to keep away from it totally and never taught asma walssifat.. subhanallah. The above is part of email send to me by Akheena Abu Hatim Bushair (KSA/Kerala,India) "Oh Allah, I seek refuge in You lest I misguide others, or I am misguided by others, lest I cause others to err or I am caused to err, lest I abuse others or be abused, and lest I behave foolishly or meet with the foolishness of others". (Abu-Dawud, Ibn
|
|||||
abu.hurairah.shabeer | -- 19-12-2006 @ 12:42 PM | ||||
The Tadlees & Talbees of Kerala Nadvatul Mujahideen in Promoting the Iranee, Rafidee, Zindeeq, Freemason Jamaludeen Afganee & his disciple Mohammed Abdu another Masonic rejecter of Ahadeeth ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Below you can see how the truth about KNM is exposed in their own CD released onoccasionn of 'Profcon'2004. This CD has proved the double face of the KNM, KJU (Kerala Jamiatul Ulema)-- because i spoke to one KJU, KNM "scholar" (AbduRahman "salafi") and he assured that KNM does not believe or promote Jamaludeen Afganee and Mohammed Abdu as salafis but anyone can see the Tadlees and Talbees involved in this. One can read about the reality of these persons-- Jamaludeen Afganee and Muhammed Abdu in www.salafipublications.com Article No. MNJ180008 , the former is a iranee, rafidee, zindeeq, freemason and the later is his student and a freemason, both where responsible for establishing Masonic lodges in Egypt. Alhamdulillah, this CD released by KNM has www.salafipublications.com in theirr list of Useful links. There are other mistakes in this article which needs further explanation but all this expose the Aqeedah and Manhaj of this sect called "islaahis". Some of the serious matter explained below (the quotes underlined are from the CD abovementioned)? 1."One of Ibn Hanbal's greatest followers, Ibn Taymiyah (1263-1328) was a great scholar who defied even the Caliph and proclaimed Islam's message among Muslims." such an unrestricted statement as this one without explanation of the reason will only help in promoting the khawarij methodology to defy the Muslim rulers, perhaps they owe this to their ikhwaani friends who misquote this to promote their 'haakimiyah' ideology. 2."The modern Salafiya'h gained momentum in Egypt whose advocates established supremacyof Islamic law but with fresh interpretations to meet the community's changing needs." What is "modern Salafiyah" ? Perhaps this is the deception of labeling the Aqlani-Intellectual, modernist movement which outrightly rejected ahadeeth which did not appeal to their corrupt methodology as "modern Salafiyah". What is "fresh interpretations" of Islamic Law? Islamic Law is consist of Quran, Sunnah, Ijmah, valid Qiyas. The statement shows an altogether "fresh interpretation" if this is the case what is the use of mentioning Fahm us sahaba --- traveling in two boats , perhaps this is "modern Salafiyah" 3."Salafs believed that after Prophet (SA) the Sahaba had the best understanding - Fahmu Al Sahaba - of the Noble Qur'an and the teachings of the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam). Any kind of interpretation beyond it would amount to 'innovation' (Bid'a)." So if you read this last two statements this will mean that this 'modern Salafiyah" with "fresh interpretation" of Islamic Law is Innovation (bid'a)as per their own statement. 4."In later years Jamaludhin Afghani, Muhammed Abdu and Rashid Ridha fought for holding fast to the purity of Islam." Since when did Iranee, Rafidee, Zindeeq, Freemasons, Rejecters of Hadeeth & Modernist started fighting for "holding fast to the purity of Islam" Now read this : Question: Are Jamaal-ud-Deen Al-Afghaanee and Muhammad Abdu Al-Misree from the reliable and notable scholars? What are their conditions and in what aspect did they deviate? Answer: They are both Masons. They corrupted the youth during their era and after their era. And they infected many of the writers, such as Muhammad Rasheed Ridaa. We have written a treatise, all praise be to Allaah, with the title: "The Refutations of the Scholars against those who criticize the Hadeeth on Sorcery and a Clarification of Muhammad Rasheed Ridaa's Remoteness from Salafiyyah." But this discussion is not sufficient, so I advise you to also refer to the book "The Methodology of Intellectual School of Thought" and the book "Jamaal-ud-Deen Al-Afghaanee in the Scale of Islaam." Therefore, they are from the Imaams of misguidance and they are more closer to Kufr (disbelief). Shaikh Muqbil bin Haadee Al-Waadi'ee [Tuhfat-ul-Mujeeb: pg. 211] 5."Can 'Salafiya'h be called as a movement? Many scholars consider it wrong to put it that way.Nonetheless Kerala has the unique achievement in the whole Muslim world, of going for 'organized' means for propagation of Thowheed ! Hence it is appropriate enough to describe it as a 'movement' in the Kerala context" SubhanAllah, unique genius in justifying hizbiyyah- indeed a unique achievement. 6."The modern Salafiya'h gained momentum in Egypt whose advocates established supremacy of Islamic law but with fresh interpretations to meet the community's changing needs. In later years Jamaludhin Afghani, Muhammed Abdu and Rashid Ridha fought for holding fast to the purity of Islam." SubhanAllah, Allahul Musta'an, we flee to refuge in Allah from these deception of satan and his allies. Now read this : Question : Is there an old Salafiyyah and a new Salafiyyah or is Salafiyyah one? Answer: The Methodology of the Salaf is one, and whoever claims that there is an old Salafiyyah and a new Salafiyyah has indeed lied. If we were to consider the Aqeedah of the Salaf from the time of the companions until this day of ours, we would find the Aqeedah of the Salaf to be one, they did not differ in it ever and if they did differ it would be in the Ahkamul Far'eeyah [rulings and its branches] that which does not emanate from the Usool [foundations] and the Aqaa'id [creed] for verily they differed in this [ahkam al-far'eeyah] they did not criticise each other and this is the path of the Companions may Allah be pleased with them all, and as for the Aqaa'id [creed/beliefs] then their manhaj has been one from the time of the companions up until now. Shaikh Ahmad bin Yahyaa An-Najmee [Al-Fataawaa Al-Jaliyyah: pg. 9] "Oh Allah, I seek refuge in You lest I misguide others, or I am misguided by others, lest I cause others to err or I am caused to err, lest I abuse others or be abused, and lest I behave foolishly or meet with the foolishness of others". (Abu-Dawud, Ibn
|
|||||
abu.hurairah.shabeer | -- 19-12-2006 @ 12:49 PM | ||||
KNM...jama'ah of fasaad The statement of Shaykh Abu Amr AbdulKareem al Hajooree hafidhahullah on KNM (Kerala Nadvatul Mujahid) Audio attached: "Oh Allah, I seek refuge in You lest I misguide others, or I am misguided by others, lest I cause others to err or I am caused to err, lest I abuse others or be abused, and lest I behave foolishly or meet with the foolishness of others". (Abu-Dawud, Ibn
|
|||||
SalafiTalk.Net : | http://www.salafitalk.net/st |
Topic: | http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=6&Topic=1372 |